One had to read to the very end of the story to reach the conclusions. I am afraid that not all of the readers saw the statement that "Despite initial skepticism from many sectors, the concept of strategic planning for NIH has been strongly endorsed by the extramural community." That was my perception from the Los Angeles and St. Louis meetings.
Another conclusion was that "The fundamental role of investigator-initiated research in the advancement of health science has been reaffirmed." This, too, is my perception--and it was underscored by the various panels and during the general discussion at both of the meetings.
Of course, there is criticism, and there was concern, but generally the NIH officials, in my opinion, were forthright, open, and genuine in their solicitation of input from the extramural community.
I applaud NIH for its scheduling of five regional meetings and for accommodating everyone who wanted to ...
