Scientists can and should remind fundamentalists of the fallacies and pitfalls that throughout history have easily become associated with an irrational, narrow faith. However, fundamentalists (and other religious persons) can and should remind scientists that the answers to the big questions (Why am I here? What is the meaning of life? Why is violence wrong? and so forth) cannot be approached on a material (scientific) basis. It seems clear that the only path that can lead to solutions for society's problems will proceed through dialogue, not through factionalism and mutual disrespect.
Fundamentalism Vs. Science
As a scientist, I too am concerned about some aspects of fundamentalism. However, fundamentalists are not responsible for the most serious problems in our society (abuse and neglect of children, violent crime, collapse of family and other personal commitments). At the base of these problems are the moral principles and world view of those who perpetrate them. Science does not and cannot address these issues. Secular philosophy also provides no framework that explains the unique value and intrin
Written byStephen Pruett
| 1 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here
Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.
Meet the Author
- This person does not yet have a bio.View Full Profile
Published In
