Journal plays with peer review

Ever wondered it would be like to tell a journal "nah, I don't think I want reviewers to re-review my manuscript"? Well, now you can -- in a new experimental policy, the linkurl:Journal of Biology;http://jbiol.com/ is giving authors the option of asking the journal to publish their revised paper without the okay of reviewers. In other words, once they have revised the manuscript, they can bypass a second review, a process that typically tacks on extra time. According to the journal's publishe

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
Ever wondered it would be like to tell a journal "nah, I don't think I want reviewers to re-review my manuscript"? Well, now you can -- in a new experimental policy, the linkurl:Journal of Biology;http://jbiol.com/ is giving authors the option of asking the journal to publish their revised paper without the okay of reviewers. In other words, once they have revised the manuscript, they can bypass a second review, a process that typically tacks on extra time.
According to the journal's publisher, BioMed Central, the editors will "carefully scrutinize revised manuscripts," and if authors have addressed "substantive issues," the journal will publish the article with an accompanying "minireview in which any flaws in the paper may be highlighted." "Of course journals must do their best to ensure that the research they publish is valid, but the primary function of a journal editor is to promote the dissemination of research results, not to obstruct it," said Miranda Robertson, editor of the Journal of Biology, in a linkurl:statement.;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/bc-aro012709.php "I hope this experiment will show that referees, authors and journals can work together to accelerate the publication of important research." Robertson is a former biology editor at Nature. According to Robertson's linkurl:editorial in the recent issue of the journal,;http://jbiol.com/content/8/1/1 the editorial board voted in favor of the change by a margin of "about four to one." She also acknowledged the risks associated with the decision: Namely, that some reviewers might decline to review papers if they suspect their comments will be disregarded (in fact, one out of five editorial board members conceded they would likely refuse to review papers they could not re-review). "On the other hand, if a substantial number of authors opted out of re-review, this would release more time for the remaining 80%," Robertson noted. The Journal of Biology is an open access journal, meaning all published articles are immediately made freely available online. BMC, currently owned by Springer, used to be a sister company to The Scientist. Tell us: Does this new peer review policy make the journal more attractive to you? Image courtesy of Journal of Biology
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Is peer review broken?;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23061/
[February 2006]*linkurl:A match made in open access heaven?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55085/
[10th October 2008]*linkurl:Yale dumps BioMed Central;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53450/
[31st July 2007]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Alison McCook

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome