Mail

Junk in our genome? Re: "Junk worth keeping,"1 just because functions have been identified for some regions of genomes thought to be non-functional does not mean that all regions thought to be junk are functional. This is particularly true for bloated genomes (like the human genome) which are loaded with parasitic elements. A nearly neutral model for the evolution of eukaryotic genome structure, proposed by Michael Lynch2, suggests that mutational biases can overwhelm the cos

| 5 min read

Listen with Speechify

0:00

5:00

Re: "Junk worth keeping,"1 just because functions have been identified for some regions of genomes thought to be non-functional does not mean that all regions thought to be junk are functional. This is particularly true for bloated genomes (like the human genome) which are loaded with parasitic elements.

A nearly neutral model for the evolution of eukaryotic genome structure, proposed by Michael Lynch2, suggests that mutational biases can overwhelm the costs associated with many deleterious changes if population sizes are small enough. If so, many features of eukaryotic genomes (introns, elaborate transcriptional regulatory systems, etc.) would be the result of semi-neutral processes, not adaptive evolution.

Richard Meisel
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA
meisel@psu.edu

As an assistant professor constantly thinking about tenure (thus, thinking about funding), I couldn't agree more with Adam Jaffe's assertion in "Double research funding? Be careful" 1 that the current funding situation is bad, frightening, terrifying, ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!

Join for free today

Already a member? Login Here