Multiple Authorship

In response to Murray Saffran’s.article entitled “On Multiple Authorship: Describe The Contribution” (The Scientist, March 20, 1989, page 9), I would like to suggest and appeal to the editors of scientific journals as well as to the NIH and the NSF to make a rule that would apply to both authorship and grant proposals: “Any individual who has been a coauthor on any paper (except that from a multicenter clinical trial) with a principal investigator (author) and co-invest

Written bySushil Jan

| 1 min read

Save for Later

Listen with Speechify

0:00

1:00

In response to Murray Saffran’s.article entitled “On Multiple Authorship: Describe The Contribution” (The Scientist, March 20, 1989, page 9), I would like to suggest and appeal to the editors of scientific journals as well as to the NIH and the NSF to make a rule that would apply to both authorship and grant proposals: “Any individual who has been a coauthor on any paper (except that from a multicenter clinical trial) with a principal investigator (author) and co-investigator (co-author) of the grant or manuscript under review, should not review or participate in discussions on that particular grant funding or manuscript publication.”

This will remove not only grants authorships on a large number of manuscripts but will also make the NIH and NSF grant funding fairer.

SUSHIL K. JAN
School of Medicine
LouisianaState University
Medical Center
Shreveport, La.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!

Join for free today

Already a member? Login Here