Skip to main content

NIH meetings move west

NIH peer reviewers based on the West Coast now have less far to travel for study section meetings, according to the Center for Scientific Review, the gateway for all NIH grant applications. For reviewers based far away from DC who have lamented the burden of traveling to Washington for study section meetings, the agency says half of scientific review officers will hold one meeting in Chicago, Seattle, Los Angeles, or San Francisco in 2008. All SROs will do so by 2009, according to in Peer Revie

Written byAlison McCook
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
NIH peer reviewers based on the West Coast now have less far to travel for study section meetings, according to the Center for Scientific Review, the gateway for all NIH grant applications. For reviewers based far away from DC who have lamented the burden of traveling to Washington for study section meetings, the agency says half of scientific review officers will hold one meeting in Chicago, Seattle, Los Angeles, or San Francisco in 2008. All SROs will do so by 2009, according to in Peer Review Notes, a publication of the Center for Scientific Review released typically three times per year. NIH spokesperson Don Luckett sent me the newsletter this morning, which he plans to publish today. In addition, the newsletter announces that the Web-based review system for NIH grant applications has undergone an upgrade, and applicants now have access to tips from study section chairs on how to get a grant funded. The publication also formally announced a linkurl:development I reported;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54087/ earlier in the month: "Permanent" reviewers can now submit their grant applications whenever they'd like, which saves them from the burden of reviewing applications at the same time they are submitting their own. The agency has improved the software and hardware used for the asynchronous electronic discussion (AED) meetings, as well as redesigned the interface reviewers use to evaluate applications remotely. Since September 2006, the NIH has hosted more than 200 AED meetings, involving 2,600 reviewers and nearly 3,000 applications. The agency plans to survey participants in February about how the system is working. For applicants, the NIH has compiled and released linkurl:tips from current and retired study section chairs;https://cms.csr.nih.gov/nr/rdonlyres/60b2d32e-ae00-4358-8c51-2e11cc46eac8/15100/insiderguideapplicantsfinal.pdf on how to write a winning grant application. Some ideas, albeit somewhat intuitive, include: Avoid proposing to "collect more data," don't assume too much, be brief with stuff everyone knows, etc. All of this is in addition to the linkurl:overall review;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54180/ the agency is conducting of how to improve its peer review. Scientists who are manning the effort plan to submit formal recommendations, culled from more than 2,000 suggestions from the scientific community, to NIH director Elias Zerhouni next month. Click linkurl:here;https://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/54009/ to weigh in on some of the changes the agency is considering.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related articles background image
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

EpiCypher Logo
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Miltenyi
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays