In the years since the launching of Sputnik, Americans have been obsessed with science education reform. "Solutions" vie with "problems" for our attention. Task forces dutifully meet but do little that makes its way to the center of the educational process. What is new and different-a revolutionary curriculum such as New Math, or a process-oriented approach, such as SAPA-is cheered at lift-off but hard to locate after only a few years,

The reason? In science education there are strong internal and external mechanisms at work against among innovators, and a fascination on the part of funders for whatever is "new," even at the expense of previous initiatives that demonstrably work.

The reform process itself is not altogether free of blame. Particularly in science education, reformers tend to simplify extremely complex issues by framing them in terms of problems and solutions. Thus, built into the process from the outset is a...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?