Texas to sue over biolab site

A much-contested plan to build a $450 million government biodefense research lab has hit another snag: A group of Texas research organizations that lobbied for San Antonio to house the lab says it will sue the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) over its choice of site -- Manhattan, Kansas. Cattle being inspected for ticks Image: USDA, via Wikipedia linkurl:The Texas Biological and Agro-Defense Consortium;http://www.nbafsanantonio.org/aboutTBAC.html earlier this week (April 22) filed a notic

Written byAlla Katsnelson
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
A much-contested plan to build a $450 million government biodefense research lab has hit another snag: A group of Texas research organizations that lobbied for San Antonio to house the lab says it will sue the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) over its choice of site -- Manhattan, Kansas.
Cattle being inspected for ticks
Image: USDA, via Wikipedia
linkurl:The Texas Biological and Agro-Defense Consortium;http://www.nbafsanantonio.org/aboutTBAC.html earlier this week (April 22) filed a notice of its intent to sue DHS, a required step for suits against the government. They argue that the choice of Kansas for the site of the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility (NBAF), which would handle the world's most dangerous pathogens, was based on political machinations and overlooks the danger frequent tornadoes would pose to the facility. John Kerr, chairman of the group, said that locating NBAF in Manhattan, Kan., would be "grossly irresponsible, the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature," according to the linkurl:Associated Press.;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090422/ap_on_re_us/us_biothreat_laboratory Kerr argued that although DHS had initially ranked the Texas site slightly higher than Kansas, the agency's secretary in charge of choosing the site, Navy Admiral Jay Cohen, gave Kansas preference -- due to ties with Kansas officials involved in the process -- by making numerous visits there, the AP reports. Kansas officials deny the claim of political preference. linkurl:Kansas Bioscience Authority;http://www.kansasbioauthority.org/news/ president Tom Thornton said in a statement: "...the Department of Homeland Security deserves commendation, not litigation, for the extremely comprehensive and fair process it undertook to ensure the success of the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility. Only Kansas offers a credible pathway to jumpstart the NBAF's critical mission." DHS first proposed NBAF in January, 2006, as part of a plan to modernize the country's biological and agricultural defense research. The facility was intended to replace the aging Plum Island facility in New York -- currently the only US lab allowed to work with agricultural pathogens such as foot and mouth disease. The new facility would be equipped to work on pathogens requiring the highest containment level, BSL-4. (Plum Island is a BSL-3 lab.) Several research institutions applied to house the facility, and the government narrowed the list to five before settling on Kansas early this year. Critics of NBAF, however, claim that the government's safety assessments were flawed, and that conducting such research on the mainland, especially in the vicinity of the country's agriculture industry, is an inherently dangerous prospect. Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius, who is currently awaiting confirmation to head the Department of Health and Human Services, objected to the lawsuit. "The three-year process to select an NBAF site was thorough, free of politics and fair," she said in a linkurl:statement.;http://www.governor.ks.gov/news/NewsRelease/2009/nr-09-0422a-st.htm "I am deeply concerned that legal action will only delay the NBAF mission, placing our national security and food supply at risk." Correction (April 27): The original version of this story mistakenly named hurricanes instead of tornadoes as the danger posed by locating the NBAF facility in Kansas. The Scientist regrets the error.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Kansas wins controversial biolab?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55260/
[4th December 2008]*linkurl:US shortens list of bio-agro applicants;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/24290/
[10th August 2006]*linkurl:US homeland security to build animal biolab;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23091/
[6th February 2006]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies