UK knowledge transfer found lacking

Upcoming report says Research Councils don?t do a good job of sharing fruits of research with the larger community

Written byStephen Pincock
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
Britain's Research Councils lack the internal skills base to do an efficient job of knowledge transfer, the authors of an internal report on the subject told the House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology today (March 29).Richard Brook, director of the Leverhulme Trust, John Murphy from aerospace firm BAE Systems and Barbara Doig from the Scottish Executive, were commissioned by the Research Councils to conduct an "external challenge," and examine how well the eight government-funded councils transfer knowledge to and from business and the wider community.Their report is still in the draft stage, and is not scheduled for publication until late April or May, a spokesman for the umbrella group Research Councils UK told The Scientist. But under cross-examination by the committee of politicians, the authors confirmed that it contains "some fairly strong messages."Among those messages is the view that "there are not sufficient skilled people in house in the Research Councils to carry out knowledge transfer effectively," said Brook. The Research Councils are far from alone in suffering this shortage, he said, but nevertheless it was something that could be improved. One possible solution could be to use some kind of external facilitator to make improvements.Brook also said that the Research Councils had a ?rather limited? view of knowledge transfer, and tended to think of it as being a one-way, outward process.Responding to those comments, Doug Yarrow, director of corporate science at the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council said: ?While the Research Councils recognise that there is some room for improvement, we can also point to significant success in transferring knowledge from the UK research base.? Perhaps the most important way the Research Councils support knowledge transfer is through the ?training of highly skilled PhD students who find subsequent employment as industry," he said. The spokesman added that it was difficult to calculate a monetary value for the councils? efforts because of the complexities of placing a value on activities such as training PhD students.At the evidence session, John Murphy told the committee that the research councils should focus more of their research funding on directed research, which could reap greater economic benefits. "No one in business is saying that the whole budget should be directed," he said, but "we are saying that far too big a percentage is undirected."Another area for improvement is coordination between the seven research councils, Brook said. In particular, the umbrella organization Research Councils UK could be better utilized for that purpose. "I think our view is that RCUK isn't being used as effectively as it could be," he said, adding that part of the difficulty arises because the individual research councils want to retain autonomy.Murphy noted that RCUK does have a dedicated knowledge transfer group, but said "it could do better." The research councils did engage in some sharing of good practices in knowledge transfer, he said, but again "there is big scope for improvement."Today's evidence hearing was part of an ongoing investigation by the select committee into the knowledge transfer activities of the Research Councils. The 11-member committee is empowered by parliament to examine the spending, policy and administration of the Office of Science and Technology and other science-related public bodies. Stephen Pincock spincock@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleResearch Councils UK http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/?Research Council Support for Knowledge Transfer? http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/
science_and_technology_committee/researchcouncilskt.cfm
Richard Brook http://www.materials.ox.ac.uk/peoplepages/brook.htmlJohn Murphy http://www.cambridge-mit.org/cgi-bin/default.pl?SID=6&SSSID=192&PEOPLEVID=420T. Agres, ?Tying up science,? The Scientist, January 2006 http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/18850/
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
Image of small blue creatures called Nergals. Some have hearts above their heads, which signify friendship. There is one Nergal who is sneezing and losing health, which is denoted by minus one signs floating around it.
June 2025, Issue 1

Nergal Networks: Where Friendship Meets Infection

A citizen science game explores how social choices and networks can influence how an illness moves through a population.

View this Issue
An illustration of green lentiviral particles.

Maximizing Lentivirus Recovery

cytiva logo
Unraveling Complex Biology with Advanced Multiomics Technology

Unraveling Complex Biology with Five-Dimensional Multiomics

Element Bioscience Logo
Resurrecting Plant Defense Mechanisms to Avoid Crop Pathogens

Resurrecting Plant Defense Mechanisms to Avoid Crop Pathogens

Twist Bio 
The Scientist Placeholder Image

Seeing and Sorting with Confidence

BD

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Waters Enhances Alliance iS HPLC System Software, Setting a New Standard for End-to-End Traceability and Data Integrity 

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Agilent Unveils the Next Generation in LC-Mass Detection: The InfinityLab Pro iQ Series

agilent-logo

Agilent Announces the Enhanced 8850 Gas Chromatograph

parse-biosciences-logo

Pioneering Cancer Plasticity Atlas will help Predict Response to Cancer Therapies