Were animals with four limbs the first to evolve fingers and toes-- or did such digits evolve long before? A linkurl:study published today;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature07339.html (September 21) in Nature claims to resolve this long-standing question. For many years, most paleontologists debated whether digits arose 380 million years ago as a novel evolutionary trait in tetrapods, or four-footed creatures. The new study, led by Catherine Boisvert, at Uppsala Unive
Were animals with four limbs the first to evolve fingers and toes-- or did such digits evolve long before? A linkurl:study published today;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature07339.html (September 21) in Nature claims to resolve this long-standing question. For many years, most paleontologists debated whether digits arose 380 million years ago as a novel evolutionary trait in tetrapods, or four-footed creatures. The new study, led by Catherine Boisvert, at Uppsala University in Sweden, identifies distinct digit-like structures, called distal radials, in the fin of a 385 million-year-old fish, Panderichthys. This fish is one of eight ancient fish species that paleontologists have specimens of, whose fossils date from between 385 and 365 million years ago, and are thought to be early predecessors of tetrapods. The finding suggests that the underpinnings of digits may have evolved in such fish, which did not walk on land, but lived in coastal shallow regions. "Here we get the first one of these archaic fish that has a tetrapod pattern" of bone structure, linkurl:Robert Carroll,;http://biology.mcgill.ca/faculty/carroll/ vertebrate paleontologist at McGill University, who was not involved in the study, told The Scientist. The findings are particularly convincing, noted Carroll, because the fish fossil that the researchers analyzed is more intact than previous specimens. Using a sophisticated CT scanning system, the researchers produced a 3D model of the ancient fish, which allowed them to identify radial distals in its fin, and concluded that "the lack of finger equivalents [in past specimens] was an artifact of the preservation of the fossils," Boisvert wrote to The Scientist in an Email. Previous data from another ancient fish called Tiktaalik showed distal radials as well -- although the quality of that specimen was poor. And the orientation of the radials did not seem to match the way modern fingers and toes radiate from a joint, parallel to each other. "The disposition of distal radials in Panderichthys are much more tetrapod-like than in Tiktaalik," Boisvert wrote. "Combined with fossil evidence from Tiktaalik and genetic evidence from sharks, paddlefish and the Australian lungfish, it is now completely proven that fingers have evolved from distal radials already present in fish that gave rise to the tetrapod." The next step in this work, said Carroll, will be to support the poor fossil record from this period of evolutionary history with genetic work to demonstrate the structural similarity between modern creatures and their supposed water-dwelling ancestors. Below is a movie of the 3-D imaging from the CT scans of Panderichthys. The orange pieces represent the distal radials.
Fish fingers point to origin of digits (Video credit: Catherine A. Boisvert, Elga Mark-Kurik, and Per E. Ahlberg)
Interested in reading more?
The Scientist ARCHIVES
Become a Member of
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
In our next roundtable webinar, learn how scientists leverage spatial biology to map tissues, uncover cellular interactions, and advance disease research.
Ten-year Agreement to Provide a Secure, AI-enabled Forensic Laboratory Information Management System Supporting DHS Forensic, Scientific, and Testing Services
This person does not yet have a bio.View Full Profile
