Skip to main content

Anti-open access bill is back

A bill aimed at undoing the NIH's mandate to make federally-funded research manuscripts freely available on PubMed Central within a year of publication was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives on Tuesday night (Feb. 3). The legislation claims that the NIH policy breaches existing copyright laws that protect academic publishers. If passed, the bill would stop federal agencies from requiring the transfer of copyright as a stipulation of investigators receiving taxpayer-backed grants.

Written byElie Dolgin
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
A bill aimed at undoing the NIH's mandate to make federally-funded research manuscripts freely available on PubMed Central within a year of publication was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives on Tuesday night (Feb. 3). The legislation claims that the NIH policy breaches existing copyright laws that protect academic publishers. If passed, the bill would stop federal agencies from requiring the transfer of copyright as a stipulation of investigators receiving taxpayer-backed grants. The details of the bill, HR 801, have not yet been made public, but the__ linkurl:Library Journal;https://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6634646.html __reports that those who have seen the legislation say it reads along the same lines as last year's version, dubbed the __Fair Copyright in Research Works Act__ (HR 6845). That bill, which was championed by linkurl:John Conyers;https://conyers.house.gov/ (D-Mich), the chairman of the linkurl:US House Committee on the Judiciary;https://judiciary.house.gov/ and an avowed critic of the NIH's public access mandate, was the focus of a linkurl:spirited debate;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55009/ at a House Judiciary Subcommittee last September as supporters in the publishing industry squared off against advocates of open-access. The linkurl:Association of American Publishers;https://www.publishers.org/ welcomed the bill's reintroduction, and said in a linkurl:statement;https://www.publishers.org/main/PressCenter/Archicves/2009_Feb/02_FairCopyright.htm that the legislation "would help keep the Federal Government from undermining copyright protection for journal articles where private-sector publishers have added such significant value." The linkurl:Copyright Alliance,;https://www.copyrightalliance.org/ an advocacy group, also backed the measure. "This bipartisan bill ensures that research works fully funded by the federal government with the intent of public publishing will receive that treatment, but also preserves the rights of other research funders and publishers," said executive director Patrick Ross in a linkurl:statement.;https://www.copyrightalliance.org/news.php?id=59 linkurl:Peter Suber,;https://www.earlham.edu/~peters/ an open-access proponent at Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana, wrote on his linkurl:Open Access News blog;https://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html yesterday that he dismisses the bill's premise and the arguments of the two publisher groups as "false and cynical." "If the NIH policy violated copyrights, or permitted the violation of copyrights, publishers wouldn't have to back this bill to amend US copyright law. Instead, they'd be in court where they'd already have a remedy," he wrote. __Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated Peter Suber's affiliation.__ The Scientist__ regrets the error.__
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Open access recall?;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55009/
[12th September 2008]*linkurl:Hearing on open access mandate?;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55004/
[5th September 2008]*linkurl:Publishers object to OA mandate;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54088/
[4th January 2008]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo