Anti-open access bill is back

A bill aimed at undoing the NIH's mandate to make federally-funded research manuscripts freely available on PubMed Central within a year of publication was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives on Tuesday night (Feb. 3). The legislation claims that the NIH policy breaches existing copyright laws that protect academic publishers. If passed, the bill would stop federal agencies from requiring the transfer of copyright as a stipulation of investigators receiving taxpayer-backed grants.

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
A bill aimed at undoing the NIH's mandate to make federally-funded research manuscripts freely available on PubMed Central within a year of publication was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives on Tuesday night (Feb. 3). The legislation claims that the NIH policy breaches existing copyright laws that protect academic publishers. If passed, the bill would stop federal agencies from requiring the transfer of copyright as a stipulation of investigators receiving taxpayer-backed grants. The details of the bill, HR 801, have not yet been made public, but the__ linkurl:Library Journal;http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6634646.html __reports that those who have seen the legislation say it reads along the same lines as last year's version, dubbed the __Fair Copyright in Research Works Act__ (HR 6845). That bill, which was championed by linkurl:John Conyers;http://conyers.house.gov/ (D-Mich), the chairman of the linkurl:US House Committee on the Judiciary;http://judiciary.house.gov/ and an avowed critic of the NIH's public access mandate, was the focus of a linkurl:spirited debate;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55009/ at a House Judiciary Subcommittee last September as supporters in the publishing industry squared off against advocates of open-access. The linkurl:Association of American Publishers;http://www.publishers.org/ welcomed the bill's reintroduction, and said in a linkurl:statement;http://www.publishers.org/main/PressCenter/Archicves/2009_Feb/02_FairCopyright.htm that the legislation "would help keep the Federal Government from undermining copyright protection for journal articles where private-sector publishers have added such significant value." The linkurl:Copyright Alliance,;http://www.copyrightalliance.org/ an advocacy group, also backed the measure. "This bipartisan bill ensures that research works fully funded by the federal government with the intent of public publishing will receive that treatment, but also preserves the rights of other research funders and publishers," said executive director Patrick Ross in a linkurl:statement.;http://www.copyrightalliance.org/news.php?id=59 linkurl:Peter Suber,;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/ an open-access proponent at Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana, wrote on his linkurl:Open Access News blog;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html yesterday that he dismisses the bill's premise and the arguments of the two publisher groups as "false and cynical." "If the NIH policy violated copyrights, or permitted the violation of copyrights, publishers wouldn't have to back this bill to amend US copyright law. Instead, they'd be in court where they'd already have a remedy," he wrote. __Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated Peter Suber's affiliation.__ The Scientist__ regrets the error.__
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Open access recall?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55009/
[12th September 2008]*linkurl:Hearing on open access mandate?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55004/
[5th September 2008]*linkurl:Publishers object to OA mandate;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54088/
[4th January 2008]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Elie Dolgin

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours

iStock

Agilent BioTek Cytation C10 Confocal Imaging Reader

agilent technologies logo