Skip to main content

Australian Panel Recommends Science Revamp

A government-created committee suggests that Australia reinvigorate its biomedical research enterprise.

Written byBob Grant
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00

Wikimedia, Paul TempletonA panel of experts convened last year by the Australian government and tasked with generating ideas that would advance the country's health and medical research efforts over the next decade has released a 21-point draft plan that would provide a serious boost to Australian scientists if implemented. The plan, drafted by the Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research in Australia, includes recommendations to create 1000 new fellowships for clinicians to devote more time to research and establishing 20 new biomedical research institutions.

The panel also suggests investing at least 3 percent of federal, state, and territory government health funding to biomedical research, a boost that could total AUD $2-3 billion by 2023.

Unsurprisingly, Australian researchers are keen on the recommendations. "We particularly applaud the panel's recommendation to increase public sector investment in research over the next decade," Brendan Crabb, president-elect for the Association for Australian Medical Research Institutes, told The Sydney Morning Herald.

But how the initiatives will be funded is a huge question, especially since the Australian government is currently toying with the idea of freezing research grants as a part of wider austerity measures. The Australian public has until the end of the month (October 31) to register comments on the draft plan before it's ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

cytiva logo
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Scientist holding a clear 384-well PCR microplate in a laboratory

What Dictates PCR Success Before Amplification Begins?

Integra Logo
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo