Australian scientists can now speak freely

In response to concerns over gagging, government agency changes policy

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
Australia's top government science organization has completely rewritten its policy on public comments by staff this week, after admitting that the existing policy had discouraged staff from speaking about their research in public.The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) launched a review of its old policy in February after several climate researchers went public with claims that they had been gagged.CSIRO chief executive Geoff Garrett asked a panel of scientists led by chemist Tony Haymet, currently the organization's director of science and policy, to consult with staff over the policy. After holding 10 separate consultation sessions, they came to the conclusion that CSIRO needed to reaffirm its trust in its scientists."The common denominator was that [staff] felt the old policy was contradictory," Haymet told The Scientist. While its preamble was very positive about communicating science to the wider community, it also included a series of negative rules about what was not permitted, he said."It started to cause people to ask questions," Haymet said. "I just thought this little germ [of concern] couldn't be allowed to continue."The review panel suggested that the existing policy, which had been in place since 2004, be redrafted. The CSIRO board agreed, and "as a result of the review we have totally rewritten our policy," Garrett said in a statement. Crucially, the new rules don't require staff to seek permission from management before speaking publicly. "We have taken out the word 'permission'," Garrett said. "Scientists are CSIRO's frontline communicators, and we trust them to discuss their science, even in potentially controversial areas."The policy change is good news, but staff will want to see the policy's words translate into a deeper cultural change, said Michael Borgas, an atmospheric research scientist at CSIRO and president of the organization's staff association."It's all well and good to put out these fine words?but the real game is going to be played out at a different level," he told The Scientist. Unless CSIRO management puts greater emphasis on funding research into topics like climate change, its scientists won't have any research findings to tell the public about, he said."It's a longer-term, more insidious form of gagging," Borgas said. "It's not clear that CSIRO will put the necessary resources into pursuing the scientific subjects that we as staff feel are vital for our society."Outside the organization, the change was broadly welcomed. Gustav Nossal, emeritus professor at the University of Melbourne, and former president of the Australian Academy of Science, for example, said in a statement: "The new CSIRO media policy is absolutely excellent, realistic, transparent, sensible and giving scientists a great chance."But others were concerned that the policy tells CSIRO staff not to advocate, defend or canvass the merits of government or opposition policies. Ian Lowe, president of the Australian Conservation Foundation, warned that ministers in the past have seen any comment on the need to reduce greenhouse emissions as a challenge to policy. "I would like to be reassured that scientists will be free to tell the public what the science says, even if that makes politicians ?uncomfortable," he said in a statement.Stephen Pincock spincock@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleScientists frontline communicators in changed policy http://www.csiro.au/csiro/content/standard/ps203,,.htmlPolicy on Public Comment by CSIRO Staff http://www.csiro.au/files/files/p8b0.pdfS. Pincock, "Australian climate researchers gagged?" The Scientist, February 14, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23121/Tony Haymet http://www.csiro.au/csiro/content/standard/psvi,,.htmlMichael Borgas http://www.cmar.csiro.au/ar/profile/borgas.htmlGustav Nossal http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/nrensr.nsf/FID/-5904C85688B61EE64A2568CF000727B2?OpenDocumentIan Lowe http://www.acfonline.org.au/news.asp?news_id=486
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Stephen Pincock

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours

iStock

Agilent BioTek Cytation C10 Confocal Imaging Reader

agilent technologies logo