From Symbols To Signals: Getting Closer To Machine Intelligence

Until recently, most artificial-intelligence researchers accepted the view that thinking consists of the manipulation of discrete symbols, such as the written or spoken language. With this understanding, they achieved a degree of progress, notably in machine understanding and generation of natural-language communication, in symbolic mathematics programs, and in the automatic proving of theorems and assertions by machines. Groups at MIT, Carnegie-Meilon, and Stanford dramatically extended theore

| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share

Despite these successes, the symbolic approach has proven insufficient. It has not adequately modeled intelligent behavior such as scene analysis or comprehensive speech recognition. Morever, even the so-called successful applications could not achieve a desirable characteristic known as graceful degradation, which is the ability to know when the limits of knowledge are reached and thereby to give up or fall hack on “common sense” in an attempt to fill in gaps. For example, humans successfully cope with ungrammatical and incomplete utterances. Machines usually cannot.

Common sense would seem to require far more symbols than the human brain can hold and process in real-time (half a second). Experimental evidence from cognitive psychology and neurophysiology indicates that the mind cannot possibly process a “program” of more than about a hundred steps in this time frame. What’s more, in order to respond as humans do, symbolic programs would have to execute thousands of ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Joe Bosurgi

    This person does not yet have a bio.

Published In

Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome

Magid Haddouchi, PhD, CCO

Cytosurge Appoints Magid Haddouchi as Chief Commercial Officer