Grizzly conservationists criticize Alberta

Government accused of sitting on crucial data, changing role of expert who questioned hunt

Written byDoug Payne
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
Conservationists have accused the Alberta government of withholding crucial data on the health of the province?s grizzly population, and of stripping a grizzly biologist and critic of the annual grizzly hunt of some of his responsibilities. As a result, they fear the province will, for the fifth year running, ignore expert advice and authorize a hunt. The government, for its part, says it?s not withholding data, and is clarifying the several roles the expert has been performing.?The decision facing [the Alberta government] involves more than just whether or not to hunt grizzlies in the spring,? Jim Pissot, the executive director of Defenders of Wildlife Canada, told The Scientist. ?It speaks to the essentials of responsible wildlife management and to the core of government accountability.?It remains unclear how many grizzlies are in Alberta. Official estimates put the number of grizzly bears at perhaps 700 (excluding national parks) out of an estimated original population of more than 10,000.In February 2002 Alberta?s Endangered Species Conservation Committee, a group of provincially-gathered stakeholders, recommended that the province designate grizzlies as endangered, and suspend the spring hunt until the population recovered. The then-minister rejected that recommendation, and authorized a hunt. The minister also convened a Grizzly Bear Recovery Team and launched a population study. The Recovery Team, which biologist Gordon Stenhouse chaired, also recommended against the hunt in 2003, and again in both 2004 and 2005. Despite this advice, the government has okayed hunts for the past four years.The recovery plan the team came up with was completed in December 2004, but has not been implemented. An updated estimate of grizzly numbers was forwarded to the Minister early in 2005, as were two DNA-based population studies.However, Pissot said the government has still not made that DNA data public, raising concerns. ?We began to see a pattern of withholding information starting last year. Freedom of Information requests on grizzly bear mortality and the DNA studies were denied.? These data are crucial for making decisions about the wisdom of the grizzly hunt, said Robert Barclay, a University of Calgary biologist and spokesman for the Grizzly Bear Recovery Team. ?Until we have those numbers it?s very hard for us to decide if we should re-evaluate the plan,? he told The Scientist.However, Dave Ealey, spokesman for Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (SRD), one of the provincial agencies that oversees the province?s wildlife, denied that the government is withholding the DNA census work. They will release some of the material once it has been evaluated, he told The Scientist, but ?it will take us a few years to complete the whole province; it?s labor intensive and a very involved process.?Meanwhile, conservationists are also accusing the government of stripping Stenhouse of some of his responsibilities. He is currently on assignment from SRD to the non-profit Foothills Model Forest Grizzly Bear program, and had been widely recognized by the public and both provincial and federal colleagues as ?the go-to person on grizzly bears,? said Pissot.However, Stenhouse sent an Email to colleagues on January 31st saying, according to the Canmore Leader newspaper, that he was ?no longer the provincial grizzly bear biologist?I have been asked to let everyone know that all provincial grizzly bear inquiries are to be directed to Ron Miller with Fish and Wildlife in Edmonton.? This raised concerns among conservationists that the government was deflating Stenhouse?s authority, and his criticisms of the grizzly hunt. He ?no longer speaks with the authority of the province as the grizzly bear expert,? said Pissot.Stenhouse has not responded to requests for comment.SRD?s Ealey denied that the government is trying to muzzle Stenhouse, and said that managing grizzlies is, indeed, done at the senior level of the province?s Fish and Wildlife branch, and is not one of Stenhouse?s responsibilities. ?There was confusion about what people understood Gord?s role was.?Last year, 73 tags were issued to hunters in a lottery-style draw; 10 bears were subsequently killed, with an average of approximately 15 bears taken annually in the hunt since 1997. In terms of the grizzly hunt, Jamie Curran, the executive assistant to the Minister of Sustainable Resource Development, David Coutts, told The Scientist the minister ?is trying to meet with all the stakeholders and to make a balanced, informed decision.?Doug Payne dougpayne@islandtelecom.comLinks within this article:?Province gives grizzly expert cold shoulder,? CBC, February 2, 2006. http://www.cbc.ca/calgary/story/ca_grizzly20060202.htmlDefenders of Wildlife (Canada) http://www.defenders.org/canada/program/carnivore.html Endangered Species Conservation Committee http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/escc/Robert Barclay http://www.bio.ucalgary.ca/divisions/ecology/barclay.htmlAlberta Sustainable Resource Development http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/Foothills Model Forest; Grizzly Bear Program http://www.fmf.ca/pa_GB.htmlA. Follett, ?Grizzly expert?s title in question as hunt announcement nears,? Canmore Leader, February 8, 2006. http://www.canmoreleader.com/story.php?id=212229D. Payne, ?Canadian research compromised?? The Scientist, November 24, 2004. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22510/
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
Image of a woman with her hands across her stomach. She has a look of discomfort on her face. There is a blown up image of her stomach next to her and it has colorful butterflies and gut bacteria all swarming within the gut.
November 2025, Issue 1

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

These fluttering sensations are the brain’s reaction to certain emotions, which can be amplified or soothed by the gut’s own “bugs".

View this Issue
Olga Anczukow and Ryan Englander discuss how transcriptome splicing affects immune system function in lung cancer.

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Pacific Biosciences logo
Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Conceptual cartoon image of gene editing technology

Exploring the State of the Art in Gene Editing Techniques

Bio-Rad
Conceptual image of a doctor holding a brain puzzle, representing Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Simplifying Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Blood Testing

fujirebio logo

Products

Labvantage Logo

LabVantage Solutions Awarded $22.3 Million U.S Customs and Border Protection Contract to Deliver Next-Generation Forensic LIMS

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Evosep Unveils Open Innovation Initiative to Expand Standardization in Proteomics

OGT logo

OGT expands MRD detection capabilities with new SureSeq Myeloid MRD Plus NGS Panel