How ubiquitin silences genes

A novel mechanism of gene silencing that plays an unexpected role in inactivating the X chromosome is published in Developmental Cell this week. But the paper by Neil Brockdorff's group in London appears several weeks after an almost identical report from Yi Zhang and colleagues from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Nature.Brockdorff, at the Medical Research Council's Clinical Sciences Centre, found that the presence of ubiquitylated histone H2A (uH2A) on the inactive X temporally correlated with the recruitment of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins belonging to Polycomb repressor complex 1 (PRC1), known to be involved in gene silencing, according to Mary Ann Osley, who is based at the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. This suggested that the events were coupled. The team also demonstrated a role for PRC1 Ring1B protein in genome-wide H2A ubiquitylation, and Ring1B and its closely related homolog Ring1A in uH2A enrichment on the inactive X. Overall, the results suggest a role for uH2A in X inactivation, she said. "Ubiquitylation is putting a single 76 amino acid ubiquitin moiety onto a conserved lysine residue in the H2A C-terminal tail," explained Osley, who wrote an accompanying preview for Developmental Cell. "Usually proteins have multiple ubiquitin chains that target them for proteolysis, but histones in general are monoubiquitylated, and that's associated with a signaling or some kind of a structural mark."The Nobel Prize for Chemistry this year was awarded to pioneering ubiquitin researchers. "Given the significance of polyubiquitylation in protein degradation, monoubiquitylation is the other aspect of ubiqutin," said Zhang, from the University of North Carolina. "There are two main points in the Nature paper. One is the identification of the E3 ligase responsible for histone H2A ubiquitylation. The second important point is to link the function of H2A ubiquitylation to polycomb silencing." Subsequently, his group also demonstrated the role of ubiquitin in X inactivation in a follow-up paper that appeared online in the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month. "Basically, Brockdorff's paper focused on X inactivation and did not address the role of H2A ubiquitylation in Polycomb silencing," Zhang said. "They did not assay the enzymatic activity directly—that may be the reason for citing our Nature paper." "It's a co-discovery, sure," Brockdorff told The Scientist, "but if you're writing about the story, he [Zhang] didn't have anything on X inactivation—but he's just had a paper come out online in JBC. Now this is something that he's pushed out in a hurry because he heard about our paper."Brockdorff argued that Zhang's JBC paper, which he described as only a descriptive analysis, contained some errors. "For example, we see this [H2A] ubiquitylation in differentiating cells, and that's quite clear… [but] in his limited analysis, he was finding no evidence of ubiquitylation in differentiated ES cells."Nevertheless, both groups agree that the findings have significance in cancer research. Another PRC1 protein, Bmi1, is an oncogene implicated in the last few years as being critical for regulating stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation, according to Brockdorff. "Understanding how this complex works opens up new avenues in terms of intervention—for example, developing new drugs and so on—because we know this is a catalytic mechanism that could be interfered with," Brockdorff said.Correction (posted November 9, 2004): When originally posted, this story suggested that Brockdorff's group showed that uH2A recruited PRC1. The Scientist regrets the error, and has made changes to paragraphs 2 and 3.To the Editor: After reading this report, I was shocked by Neil Brockdorff's comments concerning our JBC paper. He not only accused us of rushing our paper out after hearing his story, which is totally ridiculous, but he also said our paper has errors, which is groundless. With regard to his comments, I have sent him a message of complaint.According to the story, we rushed out our study because we heard about Brockdorff’s paper. This is not true. In fact, we presented some of our x-inactivation data at the Epigenetics meeting at Cold Spring Harbor in June 2004. Second, the story reported that we found no evidence of H2A ubiquitylation in differentiated ES cells. This is also a false statement. In fact, Figure 4 of the JBC paper demonstrates the dynamics of uH2A enrichment in Xi during ES cell differentiation.Yi Zhangyi_zhang@med.unc.edu University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

How ubiquitin silences genes

Study uncovers mechanism of histone monoubiquitylation and gene silencing

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of