NRC Report Sparks Debate Among Computer Scientists

A report from the National Research Council outlining an agenda for the future of computer science has attracted stinging comments from nearly 1,000 computer scientists, including some of the major names in the field. The critics say the report completely ignores large areas of computer science, such as artificial intelligence (AI). They are calling for the document to be withdrawn and revised. On September 4, the detractors sent a petition to the E-mail message boards of the United States' la

| 4 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00
Share

On September 4, the detractors sent a petition to the E-mail message boards of the United States' largest university computer science departments. The message brands the NRC report as "misleading and even harmful as an agenda for future research." It asks those with similar feelings to "join in requesting the report's withdrawal."

However, NRC chairman Frank Press refuses to consider any major changes in the report, entitled Computing the Future: A Broader Agenda for Computer Science and Engineering. The document, released July 13, was produced by NRC's Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) to define the priorities and policies the field needs in order to successfully enter the 21st century.

The conflict began as sharp disagreements were voiced concerning the report's three focal points.

Computing the Future asserts that sustaining the field's core research agenda over the long term depends upon strengthening the theoretical and experimental science base--generally rooted in ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Ron Kaufman

    This person does not yet have a bio.

Published In

Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Faster Fluid Measurements for Formulation Development

Meet Honeybun and Breeze Through Viscometry in Formulation Development

Unchained Labs
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital

Products

Metrion Biosciences Logo

Metrion Biosciences launches NaV1.9 high-throughput screening assay to strengthen screening portfolio and advance research on new medicines for pain

Biotium Logo

Biotium Unveils New Assay Kit with Exceptional RNase Detection Sensitivity

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo