Opinion: A fishy Nobel Prize

Politicians may debate whether Barack Obama deserves the Nobel he accepts today, but in biology, the evidence is clear

Written byJennifer Jacquet
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
President Obama has been lauded for his willingness to cooperate with even the shadiest leaders at home and abroad. That quality helped earn him the Nobel Peace Prize, which he accepts today (December 10) in Oslo, Norway, despite criticism that the award was premature, given that his efforts towards cooperation have been more promises than actions. Indeed, three of the five Nobel committee members had early reservations, and a recent poll suggests 61 percent of Americans think the president did not deserve it.
Drawing by Nick Lepard
From an evolutionary perspective, Obama's win is indeed fishy -- not because he didn't deserve it, but because research into cooperation began with an experiment using fish.Rewind to 1985, when ecologist Manfred Milinski, with whom I am currently designing a new cooperation experiment, noticed something curious. His three-spined fish called sticklebacks avoid eating -- during which their guard is down, making them more vulnerable to attack -- near a predator, a hungry 18-centimeter cichlid kept in a neighboring fish tank. Milinski, now at the linkurl:Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology;http://www.evolbio.mpg.de/abteilungen/evolutionsoekologie/index.html in Germany, also noticed that the sticklebacks get closer to the cichlid when together rather than alone. If each swish of the tail forward was considered one act of cooperation, it seems sticklebacks were cooperating to inspect their predator. In the 1980s, a decade in the throes of free market economics, cooperation was a hot potato. True, people tend to be selfish if they meet once or even several times. But political scientist Robert Axelrod had shown selfishness didn't work over the long term. He and his colleagues ran computer tournaments testing 76 different game strategies. After 200 rounds, one strategy was far more successful than the others. Tit for tat, where a player initially cooperates and then responds in kind to the opponent's next move, was the champion. Cooperation, not selfishness, had won. Axelrod's tournament was based on the prisoner's dilemma game, where two individuals can either cooperate or defect with four potential outcomes. Similarly, there were four options for each pair of sticklebacks approaching the cichlid. They could: swim side by side, one could lead while the other followed (or vice versa), or both retreat. Axelrod's experiments would suggest that it's most beneficial for the sticklebacks to cooperate by approaching the cichlid together. To test this theory, Milinski used mirrors in fish tanks to act like two different stickleback companions. In one, a parallel mirror imitated a cooperative companion. In the other set, an oblique mirror system imitated a slacker stickleback that appeared to fall uncooperatively behind. With the cooperating mirror, the stickleback was doubly as likely to venture into the half of the tank closest to the cichlid. In the wild, this risk sharing would translate to more food, more space, and more overall success for the species. Milinski's study, linkurl:published in 1987 in Nature,;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3808044 was the first to show that cooperation based on reciprocity had evolved among egoists. We now understand that cooperation is a cornerstone of success for many species, especially humans. Whether you agree or not with Obama's Nobel Prize, if he were a stickleback, he'd just be conforming to the cooperative rules of the school -- and benefiting the species as a whole.Jennifer Jacquet is an American postdoctoral researcher at the UBC Fisheries Centre in Vancouver and volunteered for the Obama campaign. She blogs at linkurl:Guilty Planet.;http://www.scienceblogs.com/guiltyplanet
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Nobels ripe for overhaul?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/56029/
[30th September 2009]*linkurl:Normal Borlaug dies;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55979/
[30th September 2009]*linkurl:Follow the fish leader;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55386/
[29th January 2009]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies

Parse Logo

Parse Biosciences and Graph Therapeutics Partner to Build Large Functional Immune Perturbation Atlas

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological's Launch of SwiftFluo® TR-FRET Kits Pioneers a New Era in High-Throughout Kinase Inhibitor Screening

SPT Labtech Logo

SPT Labtech enables automated Twist Bioscience NGS library preparation workflows on SPT's firefly platform