Phase I trials need improvement: UK group

Following deadly monoclonal antibody trial, experts convened by the government issued 22 recommendations to keep volunteers safe

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
An expert group convened by the UK government to review the safety of Phase I trials made 22 recommendations today (July 25) to improve first-in-human studies, responding to an incident last March when six healthy volunteers developed life-threatening side effects during a phase 1 trial of a monoclonal antibody.An investigation of the trial, using the monoclonal antibody TGN1412, attributed blame to an unexpected biological effect of the molecule.Since then, the experts, led by Gordon Duff of Sheffield University, have met six times. Their recommendations focus on calculating and administering first doses, sharing information regarding safety, and giving regulators access to specialist opinion in appraising trial applications for high risk drugs."Clinical trials in general have an excellent safety record, but in the light of the TGN 1412 incident there is a need to look at the future safety of clinical trials involving novel and potentially higher risk drugs," Duff said in a statement.Specifically, Duff and his colleagues recommend that in drug trials for new and possibly risky drugs, researchers should give the first dose to one person only, leaving sufficient time for any adverse reaction to develop before further doses or administration to more people.On the subject of dose calculation, they say that a broader approach needs to be taken that goes beyond relying on "no effect level" or "no adverse effect level" in animal studies.They recommend that, in some circumstances -- and particularly if the drug is to affect the immune system -- it may be more appropriate to include patients being treated for the disease in phase I studies, rather than healthy volunteers.Duff and his colleagues also call for earlier dialogue between the drug developer and regulator when testing higher risk agents to allow thorough review of safety data, better international sharing of information about serious adverse reactions to drugs in trials, and the development of specialist centers to undertake early trials."They're saying all the right things," Neil Williams, from the University of Bristol, told The Scientist. "But I think for me it's going to be difficult to see what the impact will be until the recommendations are put into practice."Much could hinge on how the recommendations are interpreted, Williams noted. "There's a lot in there that would be a major change to current practice, but reading it another way it could mean very little," he said. For example, staggering the dosing could entail waiting weeks between each participant if investigators waited for some types of adverse events, or could be done much faster if they were looking only for acute impacts, he said.Jeffrey Aronson, president-elect of the British Pharmacological Society and a clinical pharmacologist at Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, said his initial reaction was that the recommendations were all sensible and achievable. "The most important recommendation in my view is that the relation between a complete range of doses and concentrations of a new compound and its biological effects should be carefully studied, for example in human cells, before first-in-man administration," he said in a statement.A public consultation on the interim report will run until September, giving interested parties a chance to comment on the recommendations and give evidence.Stephen Pincock spincock@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleExpert Scientific Group on phase one clinical trials http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/74/06/04137406.pdfS. Pincock, "Drug effect blamed in UK trial," The Scientist, May 25, 2006. www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23496/#23507A McCook, "UK drug trial effects were 'unpredicted,'" The Scientist, April 6, 2006. www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23275/Expert Scientific Group on phase one clinical trials: a consultation www.dh.gov.uk/Consultations/LiveConsultations/LiveConsultationsArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4137501&chk=x%2BoJ/%2B
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Stephen Pincock

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
A greyscale image of cells dividing.
March 2025, Issue 1

How Do Embryos Know How Fast to Develop

In mammals, intracellular clocks begin to tick within days of fertilization.

View this Issue
Discover the history, mechanics, and potential of PCR.

Become a PCR Pro

Integra Logo
3D rendered cross section of influenza viruses, showing surface proteins on the outside and single stranded RNA inside the virus

Genetic Insights Break Infectious Pathogen Barriers

Thermo Fisher Logo
A photo of sample storage boxes in an ultra-low temperature freezer.

Navigating Cold Storage Solutions

PHCbi logo 
The Immunology of the Brain

The Immunology of the Brain

Products

Sapio Sciences

Sapio Sciences Makes AI-Native Drug Discovery Seamless with NVIDIA BioNeMo

DeNovix Logo

New DeNovix Helium Nano Volume Spectrophotometer

Olink Logo

Olink® Reveal: Accessible NGS-based proteomics for every lab

Olink logo
Zymo Logo

Zymo Research Launches the Quick-16S™ Full-Length Library Prep Kit