?Pro-whalers? may dominate commission

For the first time since 1986, countries in favor of whaling will likely be in the majority at the International Whaling Commission

| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
For the first time since a worldwide moratorium on commercial whaling was passed twenty years ago, pro-whaling nations are expected to dominate the annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) later this month.The IWC is holding its plenary session from June 16 to 20 in the Caribbean island state of St Kitts and Nevis. In the past month, Guatemala, the Marshall Islands and Cambodia have joined the commission, bringing its total membership to 69. Whaling experts contacted by The Scientist said the Marshall Islands and Cambodia were likely to support the pro-whaling stance of Japan at the meeting. The expected outcome is that countries in favor of the practice will slightly outnumber those countries opposed to the practice, including the USA, Britain and Australia. ?If it wasn?t for a bit of sloppy organization last year, Japan would have already had a simple majority,? said Peter Harrison, director of Australia?s Southern Cross University Whale Research Centre. ?They probably will have a simple majority this year.?A simple majority is not enough for Japan and its supporters to overturn major issues such as the commercial whaling moratorium. Those changes would require a three-quarters majority to pass. But it is enough to allow them to push through formal resolutions or statements, or to change the agenda of the meetings. For example, Japan may propose a resolution supporting research whaling.?It?s obviously a mark in the sand, the fist time that there is a majority in favor of whaling,? one source close to the IWC told The Scientist. ?We don?t know what the result will be.?In late May, Australia?s Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Senator Ian Campbell, visited the Marshall Islands as part of a trip designed to strengthen support for Australia's stand on whale conservation. "This year's IWC vote is crunch time for the future survival of whales and every vote will be critical,? Campbell said in a statement. "I have been working day and night through a range of international channels to pursue a permanent global moratorium on commercial whaling and an end to scientific whaling.? A spokesman for Campbell told The Scientist that the minister had ?very productive discussions? with Marshall Islands officials. ?They were very interested in hearing the minister?s views,? he said. ?But they were still in the process of formulating their positions on various issues.? In the long term, the changing composition of the commission could have wider ramifications. It may be that countries with marginal opposition to whaling will decide not to attend future meetings now that the pro-whaling camp is in the majority, the source close to the IWC said. On the other hand, their ascendancy could encourage anti-whaling countries who have not yet joined to become IWC members.The moratorium on commercial whaling was passed by the IWC in 1986. Japan stopped commercial whaling that year, but since 1987 has been killing whales for scientific research. Last year, the country announced that it would dramatically increase the number and variety of whales it killed each year, sparking international outcry. The country says its whale catch is needed for research?a position refuted by scientists elsewhere.Killing whales does not help fill any of the current gaps in scientific understanding of cetaceans, said Nick Gales of the Australian Antarctic Division. ?There isn?t any case for killing whales any more,? he told The Scientist. A spokesman for Japan?s Far Seas Fishery Division could not be reached for comment by deadline.Stephen Pincock spincock@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleInternational Whaling Commission 2006 Meeting http://www.iwcoffice.org/meetings/meeting2006.htmIWC: Latest news http://www.iwcoffice.org/other/newadditions.htmPeter Harrison http://www.scu.edu.au/research/whales/director.htmlABC radio: Aust lobbies Marshall Islands over whaling vote, May 31, 2006. http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1652232.htmS. Pincock, ?The scientists and the whales,? The Scientist, March 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23152/Nick Gales http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=11179
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Stephen Pincock

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

fujirebio-square-logo

Fujirebio Receives Marketing Clearance for Lumipulse® G pTau 217/ β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio In-Vitro Diagnostic Test

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours