Royal Society tries open access

Britain's national science academy has been one of the most vocal critics of making papers freely available

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
Britain?s Royal Society dipped a cautious toe into the waters of open access publishing this week, allowing authors whose papers are accepted by any of its seven journals to pay a fee and have their work made freely available on the web.The society?s officials have expressed serious doubts about open access on several occasions in the past. Although they are still concerned by a lack of evidence about the sustainability of the model, they hope the experiment will ultimately be a success, spokesman Bob Ward told The Scientist. ?It?s a toe in the water, but it?s not based on an expectation that it will fail -- we expect that it will succeed,? he said. ?We are also hoping that this will allow us to gather some evidence that the whole sector can use.?The first paper published under the new system appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Lead author Neil Roach from the University of Nottingham and his co-author were funded by the Wellcome Trust, one of the strongest advocates of open access, which also paid the Royal Society?s publication fees. "I am very pleased that the Royal Society has developed a model for open access publishing and that a piece of Wellcome Trust funded research is the first to gain from this new policy and be made freely available to all,? said Mark Walport, director of the trust, in a statement.Peter Suber, director of the Open Access Project at Public Knowledge, also welcomed the society?s decision to try out a ?hybrid? model -- combining open access with the traditional publishing system. ?The Royal Society is trying the hybrid model for the right reasons,? he said in his blog, ?to see how well it works, to answer critics, and to measure the demand.? But Suber said the plan was also flawed, pointing out that the society will not waive its fees in cases of economic hardship, will not apparently let authors choosing the new option retain copyright, and will not apparently deposit its open access articles in a repository.The fees for the new service are higher than those charged by open access publishers. Authors who choose to pay to make their papers immediately available on the web will be charged £200 ($370) per journal page for Proceedings A, Phil Trans A, and Notes and Records, or £300 ($550) per journal page for Proceedings B, Phil Trans B, Biology Letters, and Interface. For a 10-page article like Roach?s, that adds up to £3000 ($5500). This is more than double the fees at US open access publisher Public Library of Science, which charges up to $2,500 per article for its flagship journals.Ward said the fee was an accurate reflection of the cost of publishing a paper. ?People need to understand the cost of doing this,? he said. Still, the society remains concerned that the costs of open access publishing will be prohibitive for some researchers, he noted.Stephen Pincock spincock@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleRoyal Society launches trial of new ?open access? journal service, June 21, 2006. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=4838S. Pincock, "UK committee backs open access," The Scientist, July 20, 2004. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22299/S. Pincock, ?Royal Soc. attacked on open access,? The Scientist, December 9, 2005. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22856/N. Roach, et al, ?Entitled Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration,? Proceedings of the Royal Society B. http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/link.asp?id=4343416668w729n4S. Pincock, ?Wellcome insists on open access,? The Scientist, May 19, 2005. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22682/Peter Suber, Open Access News http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.htmlD. Secko, ?Author fee spikes at PLoS,? The Scientist, June 19, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23679/
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Stephen Pincock

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours

iStock

Agilent BioTek Cytation C10 Confocal Imaging Reader

agilent technologies logo