The Future of Farms

The Future of Farms How Thai scientists, policymakers, business leaders, and farmers are feeding the world. Rice farm nestled between mountain peaks © Sarun Laowong Ming Saree-on has never heard about genomics or quantitative trait loci. What he is all too familiar with, though, is blast, a fungal disease that wilts his rice and income along with it. So when agricultural researchers showed up in his village asking if he wanted to test a new variety of rice with blast resistance, he felt he had nothing to lose. He and subsistence farmers like him have long been the backbone of Thai society. But they are now struggling against a myriad of forces—such as the rise of commercial agriculture, and the migration of young people away from farming—which are threatening their way of life and a critical segment of Thailand’s economy. Thailand may be a medium-sized, middle-income developing country, but it’s among the agricultural heavyweights. Led by agricultural and food products—such as rice, natural rubber, tapioca, shrimp, and chicken—farmers like Ming help Thailand remain among the world’s top 15 agricultural and food-exporting countries, contributing $20 billion per year in export earnings. For decades, Thai farmers’ traditional skills and their judicious application of science and technology, pragmatic public policies, and a forward-looking private sector have been the agricultural sector’s recipe for success. Unfortunately, this formula is rapidly becoming unbalanced. Biotechnology solutions like blast-resistant rice are increasingly seen as the pivotal variable to ensure that Ming and other Thai farmers continue to thrive. A longtime tool Science has played a valuable role in Thai agriculture for nearly a century. In 1914, one of the first students dispatched by King Rama V to study agriculture abroad, Phraya Phojakara, returned from Cornell University with a head full of new ideas to share with farmers. The rediscovery of the genetic theories of Gregor Mendel were a major contribution to the world’s agricultural science at the time, and Phraya Phojakara applied them when he assumed the role of chief breeder at the Rangsit Rice Experiment Station. In 1917, the country’s top rice-producing regions submitted samples with desirable traits for use as potential parent varieties for subsequent breeding. The first target was regular table rice. After years of perseverance experimenting with open-pollinated breeding (traditional breeding that relies on natural mechanisms, like insects, birds, and wind in an isolated patch to produce seeds that can be saved for replanting), Phraya Phojakara’s efforts were recognized on the international stage. Thailand took first prize and swept 10 other prizes for grain quality at the World Grain Exhibition Conference in Regina, Canada, in August 1933. To this day, Thai rice—particularly jasmine—is world renowned. What’s less known is Thailand’s contribution to maize—specifically, the discovery of a gene that provides resistance to downy mildew that led to the development of the Suwan-1 maize variety. “Developed by Thai researchers for Thai farmers, Suwan-1 went on to become a major Thai contribution to the world,” Pongthep Akratanakul, chief of the Center for Agricultural Biotechnology, part of Kasetsart University, says. “Virtually all maize varieties grown in the world’s tropical areas today carry the downy mildew-resistant gene that traces back to Suwan-1.” Now, under the direction of the 2004–2011 National Biotechnology Policy Framework, science is playing an even stronger role in Thailand’s agriculture and food industries. The Framework emphasizes applying core technologies such as genomics, bioinformatics, and breeding using DNA markers to select desirable traits to improve productivity. © Nils Kahle After nearly a decade of debate, the government is poised to release clearer guidelines for researchers to more aggressively pursue field trials of genetically modified crops. Given the ongoing uncertainty as to the direction GMO products may take in the global marketplace, and the integral role the agricultural economy plays in Thai society, policy makers have proceeded cautiously. For the time being, main food products, especially rice, will remain off limits to GM technologies, but a host of other products such as genetically modified maize and soybean, which are used mainly as animal feed, can be grown locally as well as imported. The National Biosafety Bill now winding its way through the legislative process will generate strict controls on laboratory research and open-field trials of GMOs. “GM-crop development is important if Thailand’s competitiveness as one of the world’s major agricultural and food exporters is to be maintained,” says Morakot Tanticharoen, senior advisor of the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC). Food 3.0 White Knight How Thailand’s organic marketplace is being saved by an unlikely ally—biotech. Not so long ago, the mere utterance of the word “biotechnology” amid Thailand’s organic farmers evoked a call to arms because of the general negative public perception against products like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). But with rapid growth of the organic farming market and leadership from the Thai government, biotechnology is now seen as a critical ingredient to a promising future for the country’s domestic and export organic markets. The global organic market is booming—worth US$30 million in 2009, and growing by 10 percent each year. Taking its lead from the adoption in 2008 of the country’s first national organic agriculture plan, “Think Organic, Think Thailand,” the National Innovation Agency (NIA) is committed to demonstrating how biotechnology can benefit organic farmers. “Without NIA’s biotechnology, my business would not have survived to realize the good fortune we’re experiencing today,” explains Khongkaphan Siriwan, owner of Poothon Agriculture Industrial Company, a biofertilizer factory. In just 2 years, Khongkaphan’s company has transformed $30,000 of debt into some $300,000 in annual profit thanks to the fertilizer technology provided by NIA’s network of biotechnologists. Three species of bacteria were applied to his company’s biofertilizer production to increase productivity and reduce input costs: photosynthetic bacterium group and two other bacterium species—Azotobactor sp. and Azospirillium sp. “Since 2008, we have generated 25 new investment projects worth $6.1 million related to organic farming from the $700,000 we [originally invested],” explains NIA director Supachai Lorlawhakarn, who expects he can sponsor 10 new organic businesses annually. Wanlop Pitpongsa, president of the Thailand Organic Farming Association, throws his full support behind NIA. “The situation has changed. Organic production can no longer rely strictly on traditional farming methods. Biotechnology can play a significant role if it adheres to strict international standards, especially GMO-free criteria,” Wanlop offers. Supachai confirms NIA’s farming technology is non-GMO. Apart from the biofertilizer, other NIA-assisted innovations include high-antioxidant organic honey production; production protocols for organic beef with enriched conjugated linoleic acid, a potent cancer-fighting substance; and the cultivation of organic pomelo, passion fruit, and coconut flour. NIA is also helping with nonfood items such as ecofriendly herbal soap and diapers. Khongkaphan’s organic fertilizer is an excellent example, says Supachai. Once biotechnology had identified the organic fertilizer ingredients to improve the previous production process, local wisdom and expertise were relied on to develop the production process, and NIA assured that a solid business model was put in place. However, both Supachai and Wanlop agree that additional government leadership is urgently needed to fully realize the goals of “Think Organic, Think Thailand.” Specifically, they believe that the priorities should be to develop financial incentives for conventional farmers to transition to organic production methods and a domestic organic certification system. “Most of all, the national direction of biotechnology research and development must realign its support to emphasize pro-organic agriculture. [The NIA] is not enough. Political will, with foresight, is needed for this industry to thrive,” Supachai says. —Kamol Sukin In recent years, the rise of modern commercial agriculture has threatened to squeeze out subsistence farming. New entrants to the agricultural labor force are dwindling as children from farming families spend more years in school, then secure employment in industrial and services sectors, never to return to their farming roots. Thailand’s agricultural workforce has shrunk from 60 percent of the country’s total labor force in 1982 to only 40 percent in 2007. Meanwhile, the average age of a Thai farmer has increased to 51 years. In response, government policy makers, members of the private sector, and the scientific community have reached a consensus that an export-oriented agricultural production system and subsistence farming shall not be mutually exclusive. The full force of Thailand’s biotechnological capabilities should be brought to bear on protecting local farmers, says Theerayut Toojinda, a leading plant breeder from BIOTEC. Several years ago, Theerayut began working with farmers in the rain-fed lowlands of the North and Northeast. Their fields had become less fertile and their world-famous jasmine rice, Khao Dok Mali (KDML 105) and glutinous jasmine rice (Kor Khor 6), were frequently impacted by diseases and pests. Main scourges included blast, bacterial blight, and abiotic stresses such as flooding, drought, and salinity. Theerayut’s team applied a decade’s worth of research to the problem, during which they identified genomic regions associated with important positive traits targeted for improvement, such as cooking quality, aroma, and tolerance to pests and diseases, as well as flooding, drought, and salty soil. They then proceeded to locate the positions of these genes based on their respective functions in the rice genome with the help of DNA markers. “We found that most of the genes that determine cooking quality, aroma, and the targeted traits can be manipulated without causing negative impacts on grain yield and its components,” Theerayut says. Apichart Vanavichit, director of the Rice Gene Discovery Unit, is confident that the “Super Jasmine” variety that Theerayut and the Rice Gene Discovery Unit are developing jointly will be resistant to flood, diseases, insects, salinity, and drought, while at the same time retaining cooking quality/aroma, and be ready by 2015, if not earlier. Ming Saree-on is plenty happy with the results so far on his tiny (0.2-hectare) plot. In July 2008, his village in Nan Province’s Chiang Klang district was abuzz with rumors about an “upgraded” blast-resistant Kor Khor 6 variety that Ming had planted. Three months later, when an outbreak of blast occurred, there was no hiding the outcome. Much of the conventional variety rice surrounding Ming’s plot either wilted or fell flat to the ground. “I never expected that the experiment would pay off big time, the first time I did it,” he says. “One neighbor described my crop as the only sober person left standing in a room full of drunkards.” Researchers are also exploring varieties that might offer higher nutritional value and more bioactive ingredients. For example, nutrition experts at Mahidol University, in cooperation with the Rice Science Center, have identified varieties rich in antioxidants and iron. These are being targeted for further development as “functional food” to promote good nutrition, as well as to address specific health requirements, such as anemia. “These programs are exactly what we need. In the past, all we did was wait for the government to tell us what rice variety is good for us and what we should be planting in our fields,” says farmer Pitak Yapuang, who like Ming is known as a community researcher. “Now we get to try new varieties and decide for ourselves.” More cash per crop While propping up small farmers is important, Paiboon Ponsuwanna, Vice Chairman of the Federation of Thai Industries and Executive Director of Transmut Food, a major seafood exporter, stresses that to stay competitive, Thailand must transform a portion of its agriculture into industrial-scale farming. Contract farming, or agricultural production based on an agreement between farmers and buyers that sets conditions, usually at predetermined prices, is the way to go, not just for staple cereal crops, but also for cassava, a promising new source of biofuels, according to Klanarong Sriroth, head of the Kasetsart Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Product Improvement Institute. “Once the cassava ethanol industry takes off, the producers need to be able to control the whole production process, including deciding from whom to buy and what production method is required in order to ensure quality consistency and optimal production efficiency,” he stresses. At the current output of 30 million metric tons per year, Thailand’s cassava-related products, including flour and tapioca, account for 75 percent of the world market. Applied biotechnology has resulted in new varieties with enhanced starch yield, starch quality, earlier harvests, and greater tolerance to pest and diseases. Thai researchers are looking at the enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis in different cassava cultivars with varying storage starch levels as a way to increase starch content. In addition, Thai scientists have adapted and refined an existing fermentation process used to turn cassava into ethanol, which significantly decreases the costs and increases the efficiency. “While the fermentation efficiency and conversion ratio is comparable to conventional methods, the production time of the new process is about 25 percent faster, which translates into considerable savings in energy consumption and production costs,” Klanarong says. Thailand is currently ranked number 2 in the world in sugar exports; Thai scientists are also exploring novel methods to increase profits from this crop. Prasert Chatwachirawong, head of Kasetsart University’s Sugarcane Research Station, is working on new varieties with harvest intervals of 8 months, 2 months shorter than average. Prasert is also trying to nearly double the amount of bagasse, a byproduct of sugar production that can be used in feed for power plants and ethanol production, as well as pulp and paper products and building materials. “We are probably most interested in improving the sucrose content as well as sugarcane yield,” says Prasert. The current program is aimed at increasing refined sugar output from 106 kg to 130 kg per ton of raw sugarcane. Another goal of the sugarcane research station’s BIOTEC-funded work is to uncover the molecular details of sugarcane germplasm (protoplasm of the germ cells that contains genetic material), based on microsatellite markers, morphology, agronomic traits, reaction to certain diseases, and pedigrees. The process is crucial given the highly polyploid nature of the sugarcane genome. The greater the number of informative markers, the greater the impact they can have on breeding. His team has also been applying marker-assisted selection to increase efficiency of conventional breeding to develop new varieties with desirable qualities and sweetness as well as resistance to diseases and insect pests. Private Sector Power Pipat Weerathaworn, Director of the Sugarcane Research Center at Mitr Phol, Thailand’s leading sugar producer and exporter, has been pleased with the longstanding commitment the government has made to develop sugarcane varieties. But he’s also aware of the constraints under which public sector researchers work. “We continue to cooperate with government scientists on certain programs of mutual interest,” Pipat says. “However, we realize that public sector research institutes have to serve many stakeholders, and with intense competition in the international market, we know we need our own R&D capability.” Mitr Phol grossed $1.5 billion in 2009. Its research center operates with a staff of 55 working on high-yielding, high-sugar-content, disease-resistant sugar cane varieties to suit its own farms as well as those of its contract farmers. “In collaboration with BIOTEC, we are now in the process of planning to use molecular biology, particularly marker-assisted selection, to develop new varieties with resistance to smut, a fungal disease,” says Pipat. Similar research and development is being conducted by Betagro Group, one of Thailand’s largest integrated agro-industrial companies, with $1.35 billion in annual revenue. Biotechnology research has been recognized as one of the most important factors contributing to the company’s competitiveness, says Rutjawate Taharnklaew, General Manager of Betagro Science Center. “Biotechnology offers many ways to keep production cost down and to improve quality while at the same time to meet the highest standards in the global marketplace,” says Rutjawate. He cites Betagro’s recently completed microarray technology for food microbial analysis designed to detect and identify specific serotypes of salmonella. The procedure is part of the company’s preparation to ensure compliance with more stringent EU regulations for salmonella control that will come into force in 2012. “In partnership with our micorarray manufacturer, we have gained valuable knowledge for customizing a platform that is suitable for our chicken export operations,” says Rutjawate. The company now plans to develop microarray platforms for other food-borne pathogens as well. The country cannot increase its production by bringing additional farmland online, since the government has capped agriculture land use at 20.8 million hectares to maintain sufficient forest cover and ensure watershed conservation. Regardless of whether research and development comes from the public or private sector, Thailand is now fully reliant on R&D to sustain its position among the world’s top agriculture exporters. To stay ahead of the competition, says Sakarindr Bhumiratana, President of the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), a vigorous and systematic application of science and technology, particularly biotechnology, in agriculture is imperative. “It’s not just a question of the what, when, and where biotechnology should be utilized for the greatest good, but also how wisely it is applied,” Sakarindr says. Farmer Ming and his neighbors are quite happy with the direction the science is headed now, adding, “We certainly know how nature works, and that some day new problems we’ve never experienced before will pop up. It’s good to know we can count on scientists to help us overcome them.” Hold the Pork Damnoen Saduak Floating Market © Nils Kahle With its seal of approval, a unique science center helps millions of Muslims determine what is safe to eat. Although rum raisin has been a longtime favorite flavor among ice cream aficionados, it sounds considerably less scrumptious to devout Muslim consumers, who do not drink alcohol. So Sajja Sujjaporamest, an export marketing executive at ice cream and frozen food company Bouno (Thailand), turned to the Halal Science Center at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University for help in marketing the flavor to Muslims. The center has equipment to test and assure that Bouno’s rum raisin ice cream contains no alcohol. “Also, we used to use gelatin from pigs. The Halal Science Center gave us information and told us to switch to gelatin from plants,” Sajja says. The center was established with the world’s first independent Halal-testing laboratory to ensure that Muslims anywhere can be certain in telling the difference between what is Halal (allowed) and what is Haram (prohibited). As a Muslim and former Halal food auditor in a major food exporting country like Thailand, Winai Dahlan, founder and director of the center, wants to protect Muslims “to the spiritual level.” Muslims do not always refrain from rum raisin ice cream, as it is widely made with artificial flavor, Winai says. But there are more concerns in other food. “When it is in the form of non–red meat food, people in Muslim countries have no way to know if imported food is contaminated with Haram. The complexity in production processes makes it hard to tell what are the seasonings in canned pineapple, tuna, and sauces,” Winai says. To address these concerns, the center introduced the use of science to determine if the food is pure Halal. The center’s experts can trace the ingredients of products, food and non-food, to their origins with advanced analytical techniques such as combination of high-performance liquid or gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to detect and identify animal fatty acids, animal proteins and DNA, and alcohol. It also examines the hormones present in meat to find out whether an animal was slaughtered without torture, as stated in the Qur’an. Examination by the Halal Science Center is part of the procedures for obtaining the Halal logo and Halal slaughtering certification in Thailand. The center is also accepted by Muslim countries around the world. The Halal Science Center, which already boasts the first Halal laboratory in the world, also premiered a Halal assurance mark, the HAL-Q. HAL-Q was developed from Halal–GMP/HACCP (Good Manufacturing Practice/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) to ensure that Halal food or products are prepared, processed, transported, and stored properly. “HAL-Q is one of a kind, as it combines standards, regulations, and the production system together. While standards and regulations can be compared to a recipe, HAL-Q is like sending a professional chef to teach someone to cook with real understanding,” Winai says. It takes from 4 to 8 months to get HAL-Q assurance. Bouno is one of over 80 manufacturing plants that have already earned HAL-Q assurance, and more than 100 factories have joined the program. Sajja says consumers in Malaysia and Indonesia, where Bouno has been exporting for 3 years, trust the HAL-Q certificate. He is expanding the market to the Middle East and believes having both Halal and HAL-Q signs is to his benefit. HAL-Q is now accepted in Asia, South Africa, Canada, Jordan, Palestine, and Israel. Scientists from Turkey, Bangladesh, and Brunei participated in the HAL-Q’s official launch last year, Wanai says. —Kornchanok Raksaseri

The Future of Farms

The Future of Farms

How Thai scientists, policymakers, business leaders, and farmers are feeding the world.

Become a Member of

Meet the Author

Thana Poopat

Published In

December 2010

Related Research Resources

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

Research Resources

Podcasts

Webinars

Videos

Infographics

eBooks

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Products

Product News

Fujirebio Receives Marketing Clearance for Lumipulse® G pTau 217/ β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio In-Vitro Diagnostic Test

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours