Skip to main content

AIDS vaccine trial set to start

The US government is poised to start a new AIDS vaccine trial, prompting some to caution that it is too soon to initiate such studies after a linkurl:Merck vaccine;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53633/ not only failed to show effectiveness but also may have increased participants' HIV infection rate. Late last week, the NIH's linkurl:AIDS Vaccine Research Subcommittee;https://www3.niaid.nih.gov/research/topics/HIV/vaccines/advisory/avrs/ voted 23-3 in favor of beginning the PAVE 100 H

Written byBob Grant
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
The US government is poised to start a new AIDS vaccine trial, prompting some to caution that it is too soon to initiate such studies after a linkurl:Merck vaccine;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53633/ not only failed to show effectiveness but also may have increased participants' HIV infection rate. Late last week, the NIH's linkurl:AIDS Vaccine Research Subcommittee;https://www3.niaid.nih.gov/research/topics/HIV/vaccines/advisory/avrs/ voted 23-3 in favor of beginning the PAVE 100 HIV vaccine trial. The study would be conducted by the linkurl:Partnership for AIDS Vaccine Evaluation;https://www.hivpave.org/ (PAVE), which is a consortium of government agencies and government-funded organizations involved in HIV vaccine research, and is sponsored by NIAID. linkurl:Dennis Burton,;https://www.scripps.edu/ims/burton/person.htm a Scripps Research Institute immunologist and member of the advisory panel, urged caution. "We're redesigning the aims of human HIV vaccine research without redesigning the vaccine," Burton, referring to a linkurl:refocusing;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54488/ of AIDS vaccine research decided upon at an NIH meeting in March, told __Bloomberg News__. "Let's not go into a human experiment without a clear idea of what we're going to learn." Yesterday (Jun 2), linkurl:Anthony Fauci,;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/13734/ director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director told linkurl:__Bloomberg News__;https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aJ1PwyX5Ng4E&refer=us that he would review the panel's comments and decide "reasonably soon" whether to proceed with the study. The panel's advice is not the only source from which Fauci will draw in making his decision. Fauci will also consider "the thoughts/recommendations of the various PAVE partners, HIV community groups, other NIAID scientific advisory bodies, such as the Clinical Trials Strategic Working Group," according to an Email sent to __The Scientist__ by an NIAID spokesperson. The new vaccine - like the failed Merck vaccine - uses a recombinant vaccine based on adenovirus type 5 (Ad5), but administers a single injection after a "prime-boost" of three DNA-based immunizations designed to stimulate the immune system. The failed Merck Ad5 vaccine was administered in three sequential injections, with no prior DNA-based priming. "The [vaccine] regimen is sufficiently different from the Merck product to warrant further testing," linkurl:Eric Hunter,;https://www.vaccines.emory.edu/scientists/hunter.shtml Emory University vaccinologist and subcommittee chair, said at the panel's linkurl:meeting.;https://www.macrovolt.com/live/dgi_053008/default.aspx According to the NIAID, the vaccine will be tested in the US on 2,400 men who have sex with other men, but trial participants must not have detectable Ad5 antibodies and must be circumcised - the two main differences in enrollment criteria from the failed Merck trial.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile
Related articles background image
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

EpiCypher Logo
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Miltenyi
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays