Battle of the nostrils?

When the nostrils sense different smells, they may be duking it out for the brain's attention, according to a study published online today (August 20) in Current Biology. Such rivalry, well-documented in other sensory systems, has never before been shown for the olfactory system. Image: Flickr/linkurl: tuexperto_com3;http://www.flickr.com/photos/21626156@N02/2509246163/ "It's an interesting study," said linkurl:Jay Gottfried,;http://www.northwestern.edu/cnadc/gottfried/people.html a neuroscie

Written byJef Akst
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
When the nostrils sense different smells, they may be duking it out for the brain's attention, according to a study published online today (August 20) in Current Biology. Such rivalry, well-documented in other sensory systems, has never before been shown for the olfactory system.
Image: Flickr/linkurl: tuexperto_com3;http://www.flickr.com/photos/21626156@N02/2509246163/
"It's an interesting study," said linkurl:Jay Gottfried,;http://www.northwestern.edu/cnadc/gottfried/people.html a neuroscientist and neurologist at Northwestern University in Illinois, who was not involved in the research. "It provides some challenging and exciting new ways of thinking about olfactory processing." Rivalry between the two eyes -- so-called binocular rivalry -- occurs when the eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli. Because two objects cannot coexist in the same physical location, the brain has difficulty processing the nonsensical input, resulting in a repeated alteration of which image the viewer actually perceives. Cognitive psychologist linkurl:Denise Chen;http://www.ruf.rice.edu/%7Exdchen/ of Rice University in Texas and her graduate student Wen Zhou, currently at the linkurl:Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,;http://www.psych.ac.cn/EN/ demonstrated a similar effect in the olfactory system. In 12 subjects, they presented each nostril simultaneously with two different bottled scents -- one that smelled like roses, and the other like markers. Subjects reported the smell to be more like markers, then more like roses, and then more like markers again, suggesting that the nostrils may actually be alternating which signal is sent to the brain for processing. However, when the researchers presented a bottled mixture of both odors to both nostrils simultaneously, they found a similar effect. That might mean the rivalry is occurring within the brain after both nostrils deliver their smells to the olfactory bulb or cortex, and not in how the olfactory epithelium is sending the signals, other researchers say. In other words, there may be a rivalry between the smells, and not the nostrils per se, said neuroscientist linkurl:Frank Tong;http://www.psy.vanderbilt.edu/tonglab/web/Frank_Tong.html of Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, who did not participate in the study. "To really distinguish between binaral" -- between the nostrils -- "or just olfactory rivalry, they need to do other manipulations," agreed perception psychologist linkurl:Sheng He;http://www.psych.umn.edu/people/faculty/he.htm of the University of Minnesota, who was also not involved in the research, "[but] it's probably not very easy to do that." Because olfaction is a "slower" sense than vision, he explained, it does not lend itself to the quick switching of stimuli used to confirm binocular rivalry. Chen agreed that the cause of the observed rivalry effect is still unclear. "We're showing an olfactory phenomenon that resembles binocular rivalry, [but] the exact mechanism of this phenomenon needs to be studied in future studies," she said. Still, the alternating perceptual interpretations of olfactory stimuli is a novel finding, said Gottfried. "There have been a lot of studies on odor mixtures," he said, and while many have shown that the intensity of the components greatly affects perception, "none of these reports have observed fluctuations." This effect, however, does not appear to be ubiquitous. Although Chen and Zhou's subjects often reported that they experienced a predominately rose-like or predominately marker-like smell, there were several reports of a smell that was somewhere in between. They appear to be "experiencing more blending than they would in binocular rivalry," Tong said. "It's not totally exclusive." Gottfried believes this result jibes well with the inherent differences between the visual and olfactory systems. In vision, "it's a very artificial experimental arrangement where you're playing a trick on the visual system, but in olfaction, it's not so artificial." Because smells, unlike objects, can overlap in space, the two nostrils might sense slightly different odors. "Receiving conflicting inputs -- and creating synthetic integrated percepts -- is precisely what the olfactory system is meant to do in the first place." This then begs the question of "How much does this [rivalry effect] depend on the particular smells that were chosen?" said Tong. "Some smells might lead to blends [while] others might lead to rivalry." Clearly, many questions remain, Chen admits, but still, she said, "it's a very interesting olfactory illusion" which should shed further light on human olfaction.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Neurogenesis happens in humans, too;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/52849/
[15th February 2007]*linkurl:Rat olfaction molded early;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22725/
[7th July 2005]*linkurl: Dissociating olfaction;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/21028/
[20th January 2003]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Jef (an unusual nickname for Jennifer) got her master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses. After four years of diving off the Gulf Coast of Tampa and performing behavioral experiments at the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga, she left research to pursue a career in science writing. As The Scientist's managing editor, Jef edited features and oversaw the production of the TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. In 2022, her feature on uterus transplantation earned first place in the trade category of the Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile
Share
Image of small blue creatures called Nergals. Some have hearts above their heads, which signify friendship. There is one Nergal who is sneezing and losing health, which is denoted by minus one signs floating around it.
June 2025, Issue 1

Nergal Networks: Where Friendship Meets Infection

A citizen science game explores how social choices and networks can influence how an illness moves through a population.

View this Issue
Explore synthetic DNA’s many applications in cancer research

Weaving the Fabric of Cancer Research with Synthetic DNA

Twist Bio 
Illustrated plasmids in bright fluorescent colors

Enhancing Elution of Plasmid DNA

cytiva logo
An illustration of green lentiviral particles.

Maximizing Lentivirus Recovery

cytiva logo
Explore new strategies for improving plasmid DNA manufacturing workflows.

Overcoming Obstacles in Plasmid DNA Manufacturing

cytiva logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Waters Enhances Alliance iS HPLC System Software, Setting a New Standard for End-to-End Traceability and Data Integrity 

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Agilent Unveils the Next Generation in LC-Mass Detection: The InfinityLab Pro iQ Series

agilent-logo

Agilent Announces the Enhanced 8850 Gas Chromatograph

parse-biosciences-logo

Pioneering Cancer Plasticity Atlas will help Predict Response to Cancer Therapies