Biotech bailing on stem cells?

The announcement last week of Advanced Cell Technology's imminent closure is evidence that embryonic stem cell technology may be linkurl:too nascent;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54544/ for fruitful biotech innovation, according to some industry analysts. For the past 10 years Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) has been a spotlight company for linkurl:endeavors;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/24363/ in embryonic stem cell research and cloning. But in a Securities and Exchange

Written byAndrea Gawrylewski
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The announcement last week of Advanced Cell Technology's imminent closure is evidence that embryonic stem cell technology may be linkurl:too nascent;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54544/ for fruitful biotech innovation, according to some industry analysts. For the past 10 years Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) has been a spotlight company for linkurl:endeavors;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/24363/ in embryonic stem cell research and cloning. But in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing last Tuesday (July 15), the company said it was out of money and would likely be closing shop by the end of this month. So what happened? Investment in embryonic stem cell research was at its peak when states including linkurl:California;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/home/53199/ and linkurl:Massachusetts;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53359/ pointedly secured billions of dollars for the research, Stephen Dunn, director of research at Dawson James, told The Scientist. In response to such governmental enthusiasm, investors put money into stem cell companies such as ACT, Osiris, and Bioheart. But with almost no therapeutic advances to show for the cash, the hype has died down. Recent advances in adult stem cells, Dunn added, such as last year's linkurl:reprogramming studies,;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53873/ have redirected investor focus. "We've had advances in adult stem cells and [FDA] approvals. Where do you think Wall Street money is going to go?" Dunn asked. One company's troubles don't necessarily spell the end of embryonic stem cell research in biotech, Ren Benjamin, senior biotech analyst at Rodman and Renshaw, told The Scientist. "The reality of the situation is not that [embryonic stem cell] therapies don't work or have potential, but rather there is a relatively long road ahead of us to prove and develop these therapeutics." And companies will have to work harder to secure funding whenever they can, not just when they need it, he added. But Dunn believes that ACT's recent trouble is not a sign of things to come, but rather a symptom of a current dearth of funding for this type of research. "The science is good," he said. But "there are a lot of hurdles to making a commercial success out of a company" focusing on embryonic stem cells. "They are still in the basic science stage. In reality, from a commercialization standpoint, they are far behind other companies." ACT declined to comment on the current state of its research programs, but a statement from company CEO William Caldwell sent to The Scientist said: "Yes the company is suffering severely under the prolonged and worsening capital markets. So are GM and other auto manufacturers, most major retailers, airlines, oil services industry and almost all micro cap and emerging growth biotech firms. We are hunkering down to survive an environment which we believe is only going to get worse." "We are killing ourselves to secure funding" to stay in business, a spokesperson for ACT told The Scientist.Correction: In the original version of this article the company name Bioheart was misspelled. The Scientist has corrected the spelling and regrets the error.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Share
Image of a man in a laboratory looking frustrated with his failed experiment.
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Graphic of amino acid chains folded into proteins

Expi293™ PRO Expression System: Higher Yields Across a Wider Variety of Proteins

Thermo Fisher Logo