Conflict probe turns to Stanford

The irascible conflict of interest hunter, linkurl:Senator Charles Grassley;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54561/ (R-IA), has set his sights on a Stanford University psychiatrist who's running a federally funded clinical trial on a drug made by the same company in which he owns millions of dollars in stock. The psychiatrist is linkurl:Alan Schatzberg,;http://med.stanford.edu/profiles/Alan_Schatzberg and he is the chair of the psychiatry department at Stanford's School of Medicine. Sc

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The irascible conflict of interest hunter, linkurl:Senator Charles Grassley;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54561/ (R-IA), has set his sights on a Stanford University psychiatrist who's running a federally funded clinical trial on a drug made by the same company in which he owns millions of dollars in stock. The psychiatrist is linkurl:Alan Schatzberg,;http://med.stanford.edu/profiles/Alan_Schatzberg and he is the chair of the psychiatry department at Stanford's School of Medicine. Schatzberg owns $6 million of stock in linkurl:Corcept Therapeutics,;http://www.corcept.com/ according to stories in linkurl:__Science__;http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/624/1 and in the linkurl:__San Jose Mercury News__.;http://www.mercurynews.com/lifeandstyleheadlines/ci_9689122?nclick_check=1 The company produces mifepristone, an abortion drug (also known as linkurl:RU-486);http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/10905/ that is being tested as a depression treatment. Schatzberg is the lead investigator on an NIH-funded study of mifepristone taking place at Stanford, though he is not directly involved in recruiting study subjects or testing patients. Schatzberg and Stanford have attracted Grassley's withering gaze because the Senator, who is the ranking member of the Senate's Committee on Finance, says that the university did not require the researcher to disclose the fact that he owned such a sizable chunk of Corcept Therapeutics stock. Stanford's conflict policies do require investigators to disclose financial conflicts valuing more than $100,000, but for some reason Schatzberg's holdings slipped through the university policy's cracks. "Obviously, $6 million is a dramatically higher number than $100,000 and I am concerned that Stanford may not have been able to adequately monitor the degree of Dr. Schatzberg's conflicts of interest with its current disclosure policies," Grassley wrote in a June 23 linkurl:letter;http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=425632504759+0+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve published in the __Congressional Record__. In the letter, Grassley also outlines instances where Schatzberg received pharmaceutical company payments that he failed to report to Stanford, including an unreported $22,000 Schatzberg got from Johnson and Johnson in 2002. Grassley provides a list of such discrepancies in his letter to Stanford and writes: "The lack of consistency between what Dr. Schatzberg reported to Stanford and what several drug companies reported to me seems to follow a pattern of behavior. More specifically, I have uncovered inconsistent reporting patterns at the University of Cincinnati, and at Harvard University and Mass General Hospital," referring to conflicts among researchers at other institutions Grassley has investigated. A 2006 linkurl:story;http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2006/7/13/potentialConflictsForTrustees in __The Stanford Daily__ stated that Schatzberg co-founded Corcept Therapeutics, and that the University granted the company an exclusive license to develop his patented technologies into FDA-approved treatments. Allegations of conflict between Schatzberg's scientific and financial goals were first raised, according to __The Stanford Daily__ story, when two research psychiatrists at the annual meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology publicly stated that RU-486's effectiveness in treating depression was questionable and said that Schatzberg's science was compromised by his ties to Corcept Therapeutics.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Bob Grant

    From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome

Magid Haddouchi, PhD, CCO

Cytosurge Appoints Magid Haddouchi as Chief Commercial Officer