Ethics training for human studies?

All researchers conducting studies with human subjects and members of institutional review boards may soon have to undergo mandatory training in human research ethics. According to a linkurl:notice;http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-14917.htm in the Federal Register yesterday (July 1), the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) is seeking public comment on whether such training should be required. According to the notice, also reported in the linkurl:Chronicle of Higher Education,;htt

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share
All researchers conducting studies with human subjects and members of institutional review boards may soon have to undergo mandatory training in human research ethics. According to a linkurl:notice;http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-14917.htm in the Federal Register yesterday (July 1), the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) is seeking public comment on whether such training should be required. According to the notice, also reported in the linkurl:Chronicle of Higher Education,;http://chronicle.com/daily/2008/07/3642n.htm the call follows from a linkurl:report published a decade ago;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/11874/ that harshly criticized how institutions review human trials, and identified several problems with the protection subjects received, requiring seven institutions to suspend their research. In 2002, the NIH instituted requirements for investigators funded by NIH grants to receive education in the rules of human subject protection, and since 2002, OHRP has strongly recommended, but not required, universities to provide training more widely to those involved in trials. OHRP "has identified serious, systemic noncompliance" with such rules -- many of which, the agency believes, are due to "inadequate training and education," the notice states. A recommendation made last year suggested the OHRP mandate training for "IRB members and staff, investigators, and certain institutional officials, including the official that signed the institution's FWA." (FWAs are Federalwide Assurances -- OHRP-issued approvals for conducting human research studies.) If you do research on human subjects or have sat on institutional review boards, you may want to weigh in on the series of questions OHRP poses in the linkurl:notice;http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-14917.htm to gauge whether wider ethics training is needed, and how to implement it.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Alla Katsnelson

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo
Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

10X Genomics
Optimize PCR assays with true linear temperature gradients

Applied Biosystems™ VeriFlex™ System: True Temperature Control for PCR Protocols

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours

iStock

Agilent BioTek Cytation C10 Confocal Imaging Reader

agilent technologies logo
Sapio Sciences logo

Sapio Sciences Introduces Biorepository Management Solution