Giving Credit Only Where It Is Due: The Problem Of Defining Authorship

This pressure may result in "author inflation"-giving byline credit to individuals who have made only trivial contributions to published studies. For example, it is not unheard of for laboratory or department heads to routinely add their names to the publications of their staff. Also, some individuals who provide access to essential experimental samples, research facilities, or patient populations expect authorship as a quid pro quo. Furthermore, less well-known authors may invite prominent rese

| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share

Several studies have documented that the average number of authors per paper is steadily rising. In some fields-such as clinical medicine or high-energy physics-author inflation has been conspicuous, with bylines listing dozens of individuals. No doubt, this increase is due in part to changes in the way science is being conducted. While the days of lone-investigator or small-team research are far from over, multi-institutional and multinational collaborations involving large, interdisciplinary teams are becoming more common. But, whatever the contributing factors may be, author inflation inevitably raises concerns that the standards for determining legitimate authorship are being diluted.

This concern has been addressed by many journal editors. Almost 10 years ago, the editor of Annals of Internal Medicine, Ed Huth, defined basic criteria for authorship (Ann. Int. Med., 104:269-74, 1986). These criteria have since been accepted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. And they are now included in the ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Eugene Garfield

    This person does not yet have a bio.

Published In

Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

10X Genomics
Pairing Protein Engineering and Cellular Assays

Pairing Protein Engineering and Cellular Assays

Lonza
Faster Fluid Measurements for Formulation Development

Meet Honeybun and Breeze Through Viscometry in Formulation Development

Unchained Labs
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo

Products

Metrion Biosciences Logo

Metrion Biosciences launches NaV1.9 high-throughput screening assay to strengthen screening portfolio and advance research on new medicines for pain

Biotium Logo

Biotium Unveils New Assay Kit with Exceptional RNase Detection Sensitivity

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo