How the Bench Can Build SciComm Skills

A scientist’s day-to-day routine in the laboratory provides many opportunities for developing their scientific communication skills.

Nathan Ni, PhD Headshot
| 4 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00
Share
A scientist with gloved hands sitting at a table with a magnifying glass and lab glassware and writing in a notepad with a pen.
Scientific communication is not something that happens only when the benchwork is finished. It develops together with data collection and analysis.

Scientists, especially in academia, tend to treat science communication, or SciComm for short, as something “apart”. That is, writing a manuscript or a grant is something that does not start until the benchwork is finished. However, doing this creates the perception that a manuscript has to be written in one breath, which is a daunting obstacle. In truth, scientists often have to communicate unfinished studies to others. These opportunities represent a chance for scientists to develop their scientific communication skills in a more compartmentalized and manageable manner. They also give scientists a way to write their manuscripts bit-by-bit, and thereby analyze and assess their arguments and evidence on a point-by-point basis.

Recognizing Opportunities to Develop SciComm

Academic science tends to be assessed and measured in completed works—whether peer-reviewed publications or accepted grants. However, science is filled with opportunities and even obligations to communicate incomplete projects, especially as a trainee. Seminars, posters, and conferences, for example, are meant to give scientists a way to solicit feedback and spur discussion in a more informal manner. As such, they are also situations where scientists are well within expectations to present a scientific story that is more of a work in progress.

On an even more informal level, lab meetings or even conversations with peers also provide an opportunity for scientists to see how their message—and especially the way that it is presented—resonates with their audience. If they keep scientific communication in mind, they can process and interpret feedback in terms of recognizing knowledge or data gaps and identifying where points may not have been presented with the necessary clarity or emphasis.

Evaluating and Growing SciComm Proficiency

Keeping scientific communication in mind mid-study means thinking about how the data will be presented as it is being collected. What are the data points most crucial to the question that one is trying to answer, and are these points emphasized clearly enough in the text or in the figures? Scientists must be careful that the crux of their argumentation is not buried in a list of numbers, either in the text or in a figure. In the same way, are these data points supported, in an easily understood manner, by the necessary controls and secondary data to give the main point of investigation rigor and legitimacy? It is not ideal, for example, to make a reader hop within a figure from panel F to locate the controls for data presented in panel A.

To grow scientific communications skills, presenters should keep certain things in mind: do the figures clearly emphasize the most important data points? Do the captions support the message of the figure, rather than just describe it? Is the audience asking informed questions or requesting clarification? Is the presenter moving smoothly through the presentation or going back and forth?
Informal discussions and lab meetings offer a low-pressure way to develop and nurture scientific communications skills.
The Scientist

A good way to evaluate the effectiveness of science communication is to talk to people with different levels of background information. For example, a person should compare and contrast the number and type of questions received after a lab meeting presentation, a departmental seminar, and a conference. Often, the audience asks basic questions, misinterprets study details, or requests more clarification as the presenter moves further away from their own research group. This might mean that the presenter should present more background information or tweak their argumentation in their next talk to accommodate a piece of knowledge that they had taken for granted. Similarly, a researcher could ask someone from outside of their research team to look at a poster or a figure without any external guidance or explanation. If they cannot identify and understand the main points in the absence of a guide, the poster or figure may need to be re-designed. Finally, presenters should make a mental note about whether their presentations generally proceed forward from start to finish or if they have to jump back and forth between slides. If it is the latter, the audience might have been surprised by a point that was not properly introduced or set up.

Incorporating SciComm Training into the Day to Day

In addition to being mindful of scientific communication when designing and delivering presentations, scientists can try new communication exercises as part of their normal lab routine. For example, creating figures with a knowingly incomplete dataset could help scientists not only visualize how to arrange the figure, but also identify what data points need to be present in the final version. In the same vein, writing mini-abstracts or short results section paragraphs can accomplish the same thing—helping scientists find logic, knowledge, or data gaps in their argumentation as they are piecing together their study.

The best part about making scientific communication an everyday practice is that it can no longer be an “all-at-the-end” event. As scientists make preliminary graphs, sketches, and images, they are putting together the final figures bit by bit, panel by panel. As they write summaries and abstracts on individual experiments or assays, they are writing the final manuscript paragraph by paragraph. The final manuscript is no longer something that needs to be created from scratch, but merely assembled—with some added fine-tuning and polish—from all the work already done during data acquisition and analysis. In that way, incorporating scientific communication into the day-to-day routine of a laboratory scientist is not about creating more work, but redistributing it into a more manageable package.

Looking for more information on scientific writing? Check out The Scientist’s TS SciComm section. Looking for some help putting together a manuscript, a figure, a poster, or anything else? The Scientist’s Scientific Services may have the professional help that you need.

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Nathan Ni, PhD Headshot

    Nathan Ni, PhD

    Nathan Ni holds a PhD from Queens University. He is a science editor for The Scientist’s Creative Services Team who strives to better understand and communicate the relationships between health and disease.
Share
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
3D illustration of a gold lipid nanoparticle with pink nucleic acid inside of it. Purple and teal spikes stick out from the lipid bilayer representing polyethylene glycol.
February 2025, Issue 1

A Nanoparticle Delivery System for Gene Therapy

A reimagined lipid vehicle for nucleic acids could overcome the limitations of current vectors.

View this Issue
Considerations for Cell-Based Assays in Immuno-Oncology Research

Considerations for Cell-Based Assays in Immuno-Oncology Research

Lonza
An illustration of animal and tree silhouettes.

From Water Bears to Grizzly Bears: Unusual Animal Models

Taconic Biosciences
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino

Products

Tecan Logo

Tecan introduces Veya: bringing digital, scalable automation to labs worldwide

Explore a Concise Guide to Optimizing Viral Transduction

A Visual Guide to Lentiviral Gene Delivery

Takara Bio
Inventia Life Science

Inventia Life Science Launches RASTRUM™ Allegro to Revolutionize High-Throughput 3D Cell Culture for Drug Discovery and Disease Research

An illustration of differently shaped viruses.

Detecting Novel Viruses Using a Comprehensive Enrichment Panel

Twist Bio