This correspondence is late, but I must comment on the letter of L.E. McNeil on "What's In A Name?" (The Scientist, Jan. 6, 1992, page 12). Dr. McNeil uses her initials rather than her full name on her publications. That is, of course, her choice, but I wonder if that practice contributes to the persistent invisibility of women in science. Limited space dictates the use of initials in reference lists, but as a matter of principle I would prefer to see all authors spell out their first names. This is common practice in many geological journals. I must say that using one's first name doesn't absolutely guarantee against a possible "It's a woman!" comment, certainly an annoying experience. I used to get reprint requests (mostly from overseas) addressing me as "Mr." But the spelling out of a woman's first name on her publications would be an immediate way to increase ...
Initial Reaction
This correspondence is late, but I must comment on the letter of L.E. McNeil on "What's In A Name?" (The Scientist, Jan. 6, 1992, page 12). Dr. McNeil uses her initials rather than her full name on her publications. That is, of course, her choice, but I wonder if that practice contributes to the persistent invisibility of women in science. Limited space dictates the use of initials in reference lists, but as a matter of principle I would prefer to see all authors spell out their first names. Thi
Written byGretchen Luepke
| 1 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here
