December 2004

It's interesting that you claim there is absolutely nothing to back up the belief that it is our exposure to chemical toxins in the environment, caused by industry and nonorganic farming, which is to blame for the soaring rates of cancer over the past 30–40 years.1 How can you say in one fell swoop that our food is safe if you haven't conducted extensive research to establish that significant levels of various chemicals are never inserted into the food supply system? You can't, but you cho

you may want to consider the other type of structured water, namely, inside proteins.

Your correspondent suggests that science may be making the combat theater safer for soldiers.

In March, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, meant to be the centerpiece of a new national system to prevent bioterrorists from seeing research they could transform into bioweapons (see http://www.the-scientist.com/news/20040305/04). But since then, the board has never met, its members have not been chosen, and its professional staff is not yet in place. As of earlier this month, the news page of its Web site had not

he had his doubts about its validity.

Richard Clapp, whose yet unpublished study of cancer deaths among IBM workers at semiconductor plants has been the subject of controversy, says he is finally submitting his data to a print journal.

Asia started this year braced for another SARS epidemic, but the real infectious disease story turned out to be avian influenza, which spread wildly among the region's poultry in January and February.

reported that several high-level scientists and officials at the National Institutes of Health had collectively received more than $2.5 million in consulting fees and stock options from drug and biotech companies, the NIH, Congress, and scientists are still at odds over the agency's conflict-of-interest rules.

The body of a caterpillar is the site of both a great feast and a gruesome familial struggle.

Charles Darwin spotted it.

The first published study linking gene to disease is often far from the last word on the subject.

magazine, 71% of American men believe their dogs understand them at some telepathic level.

Sometimes, the number of times a paper has been cited barely begins to describe the importance of the work.

By exploiting a malaria parasite's "Achilles heel," researchers in Germany say a transgenic whole-organism vaccine for humans may be possible.

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) appear to silence genes in mice without triggering an immune response, according to researchers at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

Researchers have identified a key enzyme in sea urchin egg fertilization.

Stem cell researchers in Asia expressed relief at the recent United Nations decision to move away from a total ban on human cloning.

A majority of Swiss voters support a new law that will allow stem cells to be extracted from 7-day-old human embryos for research purposes.

A post-election "lame duck" Congress recently returned to Washington, DC, and approved an omnibus funding measure for fiscal year 2005, which began October 1.

It's been six years since human embryonic stem cells appeared on the public radar screen, and we still don't know what to call them.