More Questions About IV Drug

Another clinical trial raises concerns about the efficacy and safety of a common intravenous treatment for patients that have lost large amounts of blood.

Written byBob Grant
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

Wikimedia, MichaelberryHydroxyethyl starch (HES), which is typically given to emergency room patients that have lost a lot of blood or are suffering systemic infection, is under the microscope again after recent clinical trial results indicate that the treatment may do more harm than good. The new data, published yesterday in The New England Journal of Medicine, indicated that of more than 6,600 patients treated with HES in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand, 18 percent treated with HES died within 90 days compared to 17 percent treated with simple saline solution. Though that result isn't statistically significant, patients receiving HES were also more likely to require kidney replacement than patients receiving saline, and HES-treated patients experienced significantly higher rates of adverse events such as itching and bleeding.

"We need to consider more closely what fluid we give to specific patients and how much," lead author John Myburgh of The George Institute for Global Health in Sydney, Australia, told ScienceNOW. "These are really intravenous drugs and should be treated as such."

These latest data add to a body of literature that suggests problems with HES treatment. This past June, a Danish study suggested that patients receiving HES were significantly more likely to die within 90 days or to require kidney transplants than those getting an alternative solution called Ringer's acetate. That study kicked up controversy over a misplaced decimal point, which was subsequently corrected, and led the US Food and Drug Administration to consider discontinuing HES treatment for infection patients.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile
Share
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies