Skip to main content

Stress strikes cytogenetics

Cellular stress during replication induces many small deletions and duplications in the genome, adding fuel for human diversity and disease, researchers reported today (Nov. 13) at the __American Society of Human Genetics__ linkurl:meeting;www.ashg.org/2008meeting/ in Philadelphia. Replication stress is known to be hazardous for the cell, and is thought to contribute to ageing and cancer. But exactly how stress causes DNA damage has remained unclear. Last year, a team led by linkurl:Thomas Glo

Written byElie Dolgin
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Cellular stress during replication induces many small deletions and duplications in the genome, adding fuel for human diversity and disease, researchers reported today (Nov. 13) at the __American Society of Human Genetics__ linkurl:meeting;www.ashg.org/2008meeting/ in Philadelphia. Replication stress is known to be hazardous for the cell, and is thought to contribute to ageing and cancer. But exactly how stress causes DNA damage has remained unclear. Last year, a team led by linkurl:Thomas Glover,;https://www.hg.med.umich.edu/facultyprofile.php?id=7 a human geneticist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, showed that human-mouse hybrid cells exposed to linkurl:aphidicolin;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphidicolin -- an antibiotic that inhibits DNA polymerase and induces mitotic stress -- led to a high frequency of submicroscopic deletions at a particular genomic site with elevated susceptibility to DNA damage (__PNAS__, 105: 246-251, 2007). Now, Glover's team exposed linkurl:human fibroblasts;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/54683/ to the same stressful conditions, and compared the stressed out cells with their normal counterparts using array-based linkurl:comparative genomic hybridization.;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/53607/ Their results revealed a suite of sequence copy number changes -- deletions and duplications -- between the stressed sample and control DNA. They found that eight of their 14 stressed cell populations had at least one copy number change, compared to only one of 11 control populations. On average, each stressed cell population had 2.2 copy number changes after three days of aphidicolin-treatment -- about 10 times more changes than the control -- with no apparent patterning between chromosomes. "Numbers of deletions and duplications are just scattered across the genome," Martin Arlt, the study's lead author, said in a presentation. The deletions varied from 25 to around 1,300 kilobases, while the duplications were slightly larger, ranging from 143 to around 2,800 kilobases. In one instance, the researchers observed the same deletion in two independent cell lines, indicating that there might be a predictable pathway to stress-induced DNA damage. Glover's team sequenced the deletions' breakpoint junctions, and discovered that they were all characterized by short equivalent DNA sequences called microhomologies. This pattern is consistent with a particular form of DNA repair that uses microhomologies to mend DNA damage, known as linkurl:non-homologous end joining,;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/20076/ rather than other genetic fix-it methods that rely on matching DNA templates, the researchers concluded. Since the observed deletions and duplications closely resembled linkurl:copy number variants;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/54856/ seen in screens of human diversity, as well as spontaneous DNA changes implicated in diseases such as cancer, stress during cell division is likely a major contributor to both normal and aberrant genomic copy number changes, Arlt said.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo