MRI scans from more than 800 incarcerated men pinpoint distinct structural features of people who have committed homicide, compared with those who carried out other crimes.

Joey Ramp went back to college to study post-traumatic stress disorder. But the dogs that help her manage her own PTSD complicate her research career.

The European Court of Justice has decided that organisms made with precision techniques such as CRISPR will be subject to the same rules as transgenic plants or animals.

LabCorp might be able to charge a licensing fee to any scientists who wish to sequence the gene HOMER1 in people who may have autism.

In an ongoing legal battle, the University of California, Berkeley has challenged the Broad Institute’s patent claims on the gene editing technology.

The suit claims that Rational Vaccines, the company of recently deceased researcher William Halford, violated US and international laws when it carried out the procedure.

Scientists in the U.K., in collaboration with members of the judiciary, have launched the first in a series of explanatory documents designed to help integrate science into the courtroom.

A US Court of Appeals ruled that the Interior Department acted prematurely in removing the animals from the endangered species list.

Is the deep uncertainty surrounding fundamental legal and ethical norms putting biobanks in a precarious position? 

John Robertson was known for his contributions to reproductive medicine ethics and for solidifying the scholarly connection between biomedicine and law.

Diego Gomez was facing jail time in Colombia for posting someone else’s copyrighted thesis online.

Representatives follow the lead of senators in drafting a bill that would encourage federal scientists to share data.

Attorneys representing pathologist Fazlul Sarkar and users of the post-publication peer review website present their cases regarding the constitutionality of subpoenaing for the identities of anonymous commenters.

The embattled stem cell researcher faces a new investigation exploring his culpability in the deaths of two patients he treated.

Advances in neuroimaging have improved our understanding of the brain, but the resulting data do little to help judges and juries determine criminal culpability.

The Federal Court of Australia rejected an appeal of a ruling that allows companies to patent isolated human genes.

A measure moving through the California legislature requires farmers to obtain a prescription to administer antibiotics to livestock.

The country’s fertility regulator reported that the technique has “broad support.”

New Jersey judges are now required to explain to jurors that the human memory is prone to errors.