The Scientific Outreach Gap

A survey finds that arts, humanities, and social science faculty members in the U.K. engage more with the general public than their counterparts in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share

Are female scientists better about public outreach?WIKIMEDIA, UNITED STATES NAVYScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) researchers do not engage in public outreach as much as academics in the arts, humanities, and social sciences (AHSS), according to a survey of faculty members in the U.K. What’s more, female researchers in both areas work with the general public more than their male counterparts, the study found. “The project suggests that public engagement is more firmly embedded in the context of the arts, humanities, and social sciences than it is among researchers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” wrote the authors of the report, which was funded by a consortium of UK scientific societies and funders, including the Wellcome Trust. “Wide ranging research over a lengthy period shows that institutional change of this kind is highly challenging and that higher education institutions are known to be relatively slow to change.”

The authors surveyed more than 2,500 academics in the U.K., asking about the scholars’ efforts to communicate with the public. The survey tuned up several differences between AHSS and STEM researchers. For example, More than 60 percent of AHSS researchers indicated that they had lectured in a public forum in the past year, while only 40 percent of STEM researchers said they had done the same.

The more complicated nature of research in STEM fields may have something to do with the reduced public engagement, but that factor alone shouldn’t excuse researchers from discussing their work in wider forums, according to Chloe Sheppard, researchers’ engagement manager at the Wellcome Trust and chair of the steering group that directed the study. “I don’t think [this explanation] ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Bob Grant

    From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome