UCLA prof falsified cancer data

A former UCLA biologist falsified data on biomarkers and treatments for cancer in two journal articles and multiple grant applications, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) reported last week. According to the ORI notice, Mai Nguyen, an associate professor of surgery at UCLA from 1995-2005, falsified data published in a 2000 Oncology Reports paper, which has been cited 5 times, and a 2001 article in The Lancet, which has been cited 25 times. The papers examined the effect of Livistona chine

Written byTia Ghose
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
A former UCLA biologist falsified data on biomarkers and treatments for cancer in two journal articles and multiple grant applications, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) reported last week. According to the ORI notice, Mai Nguyen, an associate professor of surgery at UCLA from 1995-2005, falsified data published in a 2000 Oncology Reports paper, which has been cited 5 times, and a 2001 article in The Lancet, which has been cited 25 times. The papers examined the effect of Livistona chinensis, a Chinese fan palm extract, on mouse fibrosarcoma cells, and the use of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in nipple fluid as biomarkers for cancer, respectively. Nguyen also fudged experiments and figures in grant applications submitted to the National Institute of Health, National Center for Complimentary and Alternative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grants, the ORI reported. In one NIH grant, for example, she falsified the number of experiments done and the number of animals used in studies of Livistona's anticancer effect. In the same grant, she falsely claimed that she used a specific technique to measure uptake of radioactive thymidine. ORI officials declined to provide further information; as part of the case's settlement, the ORI was barred from speaking about details not included in its official report. Roberto Peccei, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCLA, told The Scientist that he was first alerted to potential misconduct in 2000 by a former postdoc in Nguyen's lab, Jing Liang Wang. After finding grounds for further investigation, he brought his preliminary findings to the university's Privilege & Tenure Committee. The committee conducted a separate investigation, finding Nguyen guilty of misconduct in 2004. As a result of the findings, Nguyen was barred from conducting research for three years, but was allowed to retain her post as faculty member. She contested the committee's findings, but the sanctions were approved in 2005, Peccei said. "She always took the point of view that she was innocent. Ultimately she could not convince a committee of her peers," Peccei said. However, Nguyen and UCLA disagreed on how the ruling barring her from research should be interpreted, Peccei said. Though Nguyen closed her lab, he explained, "she understood banishment from doing research to not include publishing." Since 2005, she has published 10 articles under her married name, Mai Brooks, continuing to collaborate with some of her coauthors on the Lancet and Oncology Reports papers. Four of her collaborators on those papers contacted by The Scientist declined to comment. The disagreement caused Nguyen to resign in 2005. She is currently a surgical oncologist at UCLA Medical School, according to affiliations listed on the 2009 Methods in Molecular Biology review. Peccei said the long, drawn-out nature of the case led UCLA to revise some of its policies for conducting investigations "because it was so confusing and so painful." In the past, the Privilege and Tenure Committee both performed misconduct investigations and decided on disciplinary action, he said, but the university has since decided that the committee should not act as "both judge and jury." Instead, misconduct investigations are now conducted through the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research; only if misconduct is found does a case go to the Privilege and Tenure Committee. "This was not a case that went very well for anyone involved, even though there was good faith on all sides," Peccei said.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
December digest cover image of a wooden sculpture comprised of multiple wooden neurons that form a seahorse.
December 2025, Issue 1

Wooden Neurons: An Artistic Vision of the Brain

A neurobiologist, who loves the morphology of cells, turns these shapes into works of art made from wood.

View this Issue
Stacks of cell culture dishes, plates, and flasks with pink cell culture medium on a white background.

Driving Innovation with Cell Culture Essentials

Merck
Stacks of cell culture dishes, plates, and flasks with pink cell culture medium on a white background.

Driving Innovation with Cell Culture Essentials

MilliporeSigma purple logo
Abstract wireframe sphere with colorful dots and connecting lines representing the complex cellular and molecular interactions within the tumor microenvironment.

Exploring the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment 

Cellecta logo
An image of a DNA sequencing spectrum with a radial blur filter applied.

A Comprehensive Guide to Next-Generation Sequencing

Integra Logo

Products

brandtech logo

BRANDTECH® Scientific Announces Strategic Partnership with Copia Scientific to Strengthen Sales and Service of the BRAND® Liquid Handling Station (LHS) 

Top Innovations 2026 Contest Image

Enter Our 2026 Top Innovations Contest

Biotium Logo

Biotium Expands Tyramide Signal Amplification Portfolio with Brighter and More Stable Dyes for Enhanced Spatial Imaging

Labvantage Logo

LabVantage Solutions Awarded $22.3 Million U.S Customs and Border Protection Contract to Deliver Next-Generation Forensic LIMS