Canadian Researchers Fret About Funding

Melvin Silverman, professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, recently got a call from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The CIHR surveyor asked the scientist who would benefit from his studies of diabetes and membrane function, and what the intermediate and final outcome of the work would be. To Silverman, the questioner had asked him to justify the funding of basic biomedical research according to its direct community health benefits, rather than its scientific significance.

Paula Park

| 5 min read

Listen with Speechify

0:00

5:00

Silverman answered "undiplomatically," he says, calling the questions "ignorant." Yet, the survey reflected the mandate of the new CIHR: to serve the country's diverse population and balance social and behavioral science revelations with basic discoveries in the lab. "It's a dance with the devil," he worries. "Interdisciplinary research is where things are at, at the cutting edge of new knowledge. The problem is money, and when there's a money problem, the jealousies of different departments dominate.... At the end of five years we could end up having a lower budget."

Money problems actually prompted the creation of the new CIHR in June 2000. That year, a consortium of scientists, physicians, academics, and industry representatives scrapped the former Medical Research Council, which funded only biomedical research, and replaced it with the CIHR, a complicated new funding agency. The goal: to help the country compete with what many in Canada consider the ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!

Join for free today

Already a member? Login Here