Dog sacrificed for sales demonstration

In an unprecedented exercise, a neurosurgeon at Cleveland Clinic violated the Clinic's animal use code, but perhaps not federal law

kerry grens
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
The United States Department of Agriculture and Cleveland Clinic are investigating an incident in which a neurosurgeon induced an aneurysm in an anaesthetized dog to demonstrate a medical device to sales people, and later destroyed the animal. The incident, which Cleveland Clinic reported to the USDA last week, at the very least violated the Clinic's official rules, but perhaps not federal law. "Cleveland Clinic does not allow procedures with animals for the sole purpose of sales training," according to a statement Cleveland Clinic Emailed to The Scientist. "The situation that occurred yesterday was unauthorized and not in compliance with our policy." According to news reports, the neurosurgeon requested permission from Cleveland Clinic's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to use the dog, but did not receive a response by the time of the sales demonstration. The clinic had approved the neurosurgeon's use of a dog to induce an aneurysm, but did not approve its use for the sales demonstration, the Associated Press reported. A spokesperson for Cleveland Clinic would not comment beyond the official statement until its investigation into the incident is complete, and would not release the surgeon's name, or details on the device or its manufacturer.Jim Rogers, spokesperson for the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, told The Scientist APHIS is sending an officer to Cleveland Clinic to "review the facility and help us determine if an investigation is needed." Rogers said it is undetermined whether the neurosurgeon broke federal law in his use of the dog. An institution's policy for animal use is determined by the institution's IACUC, which is reviewed and approved by the USDA. General guidelines that must be followed are outlined in the federal Animal Welfare Act (in which rats and mice are excluded) and the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Rogers said the maximum penalty for violating the Animal Welfare Act is $2750, applied to the institution or individual that owns the license for animal use.John Miller, executive director of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC), said that using a dog for a sales demonstration does not violate the Animal Welfare Act per se. "What was problematic in this case was it was not permitted by [Cleveland Clinic's] IACUC, and if IACUC had known, it probably would not have approved" the use of the dog for this situation, Miller told The Scientist. "The bottom line was it was never reviewed by IACUC so it was in violation of the Animal Welfare Act." Miller said the incident would not warrant suspension of Cleveland Clinic's accreditation by AAALAC. This is the first time Miller has heard of a scientist sacrificing an animal for a sales event. "It has not come up in the over ten years that I've been [at the AALAC]," he said. Harry Rozmiarek, treasurer for Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research, which offers training for developing IACUC policies, told The Scientist, "It would be unlikely that the terminal use of animals strictly for sales demonstrations would be acceptable" by an institution's IACUC. Rozmiarek pointed out that there are situations in which an animal might be sacrificed during physician training of a medical device, when sales people were present, but like others interviewed by The Scientist, he said he had not heard of an IACUC permitting the use of an animal solely for a sales demonstration. In response to the incident, the Humane Society of the United States is urging the USDA to amend the Animal Welfare Act to explicitly prohibit the use of animals for sales demonstrations. "This is outrageous and shouldn't be allowed," Andrew Rowan, executive vice president of the Humane Society, told The Scientist. Rowan said the incident at Cleveland Clinic reveals weaknesses in oversight of animal use. "The USDA could do a lot more to establish national standards. Everybody makes up their own standards, and it's possible another place might have approved this protocol and seen nothing wrong with it," Rowan said.Kerry Grens kgrens@the-scientist.comLinks within this article:Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee http://www.iacuc.orgUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service http://www.aphis.usda.govR Finn, "Veterinarians in research labs address conflicting agendas," The Scientist, May 26, 1997. http://www.the-scientist.com/1997/5/26/1/3Animal Welfare Act http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htmJK Borchardt, "US debates care standards for small laboratory animals," The Scientist, July16, 2001. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/19782Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdfAssociation for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care http://www.aaalac.orgPublic Responsibility in Medicine and Research http://www.primr.orgHumane Society of the United State http://www.hsus.orgO Siddiqui, "Groups attack USDA animal plan," The Scientist, June 13, 2003. 'http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/21384
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • kerry grens

    Kerry Grens

    Kerry served as The Scientist’s news director until 2021. Before joining The Scientist in 2013, she was a stringer for Reuters Health, the senior health and science reporter at WHYY in Philadelphia, and the health and science reporter at New Hampshire Public Radio. Kerry got her start in journalism as a AAAS Mass Media fellow at KUNC in Colorado. She has a master’s in biological sciences from Stanford University and a biology degree from Loyola University Chicago.

Share
3D illustration of a gold lipid nanoparticle with pink nucleic acid inside of it. Purple and teal spikes stick out from the lipid bilayer representing polyethylene glycol.
February 2025, Issue 1

A Nanoparticle Delivery System for Gene Therapy

A reimagined lipid vehicle for nucleic acids could overcome the limitations of current vectors.

View this Issue
Considerations for Cell-Based Assays in Immuno-Oncology Research

Considerations for Cell-Based Assays in Immuno-Oncology Research

Lonza
An illustration of animal and tree silhouettes.

From Water Bears to Grizzly Bears: Unusual Animal Models

Taconic Biosciences
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino

Products

Tecan Logo

Tecan introduces Veya: bringing digital, scalable automation to labs worldwide

Explore a Concise Guide to Optimizing Viral Transduction

A Visual Guide to Lentiviral Gene Delivery

Takara Bio
Inventia Life Science

Inventia Life Science Launches RASTRUM™ Allegro to Revolutionize High-Throughput 3D Cell Culture for Drug Discovery and Disease Research

An illustration of differently shaped viruses.

Detecting Novel Viruses Using a Comprehensive Enrichment Panel

Twist Bio