Environment Health Perspectives faces cuts

Journal trims news and other sections after plans to privatize fail

Written byChandra Shekhar
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
Environment Health Perspectives (EHP) appears to be facing hard times. After nixing plans to privatize due to strong public opposition, the publication faces cuts in funding, forcing it to trim the news and commentary sections, and axe translations and free shipping to developing countries.One of the first journals to go open-access, EHP is the peer-reviewed scientific publication of the NIH's National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Currently, the journal, which has an impact factor of 5.34, costs $3.5 million per year to publish. NIEHS director David Schwartz declined to specify how much of this funding the journal was going to lose. "NIH has gone through two flat budget cycles with salaries increasing and cost of grants increasing," he said. "We have to look very closely at all of our expenditures. We are not singling out EHP."Facing a tight budget, NIEHS floated a proposal last September to privatize EHP. Strong public opposition to this plan convinced the institute to continue publishing it, but in June, Schwartz announced that the journal would need to "reduce production costs during difficult budgetary times."Among the targets of cost cutting at EHP will be the journal's free shipping of print copies to developing countries, a quarterly Chinese language edition, and translations of parts of the journal into Chinese, French, Japanese, Russian, and Spanish. "We just don't have the funds to translate it into many languages and ship it all over the world," Schwartz told The Scientist.The news, commentary, and announcement sections of the magazine will also be curtailed, Schwartz said, adding that these pages account for almost half the magazine's annual budget. The details are still being worked out, he said.Schwartz pointed out that there are other open-access journals "of equal or higher quality that are published for far less," such as the Journal of Clinical Investigation, which has an annual budget of $2.5 million and an impact factor of 15.1. "We really want to make sure that EHP is competitive with other journals both in terms of its cost as well as its impact," Schwartz said.Environmental health researchers had mixed reactions to the proposed changes at EHP. "I'm delighted that they decided not to privatize it," said Philip Lee, former US Assistant Secretary of Health and current chair of the Collaborative on Health and the Environment, a Bolinas, Calif-based nonprofit that promotes study of the links between human health and environmental factors. "The most important thing is to continue publishing the peer-reviewed scientific papers. If you have to cut somewhere, the news and commentary section is a logical place to cut," he said. "It is unfortunate that they have to eliminate the translation."The cost cutting at EHP is "the opposite of what should be happening," said Joel Michalek, co-director of the department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of Texas Health Sciences Campus at San Antonio. An author as well as reviewer at EHP, Michalek said the journal's financial problems could "generate a groundswell of concern among researchers that might rescue the journal," but added that, with the NIH funding crunch, "everyone is worried about keeping their projects funded. The EHP dilemma is not at the top of the list."Chandra Shekhar cshekhar@the-scientist.comLinks within this articleEnvironmental Health Perspectives (EHP) http://www.ehponline.org/The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences http://www.niehs.nih.gov/K.Y. Kreeger, "Environmental Health Institute blends toxicology and molecular biology," The Scientist, May 1, 1995 http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/16493/David Schwartz http://www.ehponline.org/docs/admin/schwartz.htmlCongressman Dennis Kucinich's letter opposing privatization of EHP http://www.kucinich.us/floor_speeches/hl_privatize_env_hlth16nov.phpJournal of Clinical Investigation http://www.jci.org/Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE) http://www.healthandenvironment.org/Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio http://ceb.uthscsa.edu/index.html
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

Share
Image of a woman with her hands across her stomach. She has a look of discomfort on her face. There is a blown up image of her stomach next to her and it has colorful butterflies and gut bacteria all swarming within the gut.
November 2025, Issue 1

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

These fluttering sensations are the brain’s reaction to certain emotions, which can be amplified or soothed by the gut’s own “bugs".

View this Issue
An image of a DNA sequencing spectrum with a radial blur filter applied.

A Comprehensive Guide to Next-Generation Sequencing

Integra Logo
Golden geometric pattern on a blue background, symbolizing the precision, consistency, and technique essential to effective pipetting.

Best Practices for Precise Pipetting

Integra Logo
Olga Anczukow and Ryan Englander discuss how transcriptome splicing affects immune system function in lung cancer.

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Pacific Biosciences logo
Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Products

Labvantage Logo

LabVantage Solutions Awarded $22.3 Million U.S Customs and Border Protection Contract to Deliver Next-Generation Forensic LIMS

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Evosep Unveils Open Innovation Initiative to Expand Standardization in Proteomics

OGT logo

OGT expands MRD detection capabilities with new SureSeq Myeloid MRD Plus NGS Panel