PCRM denied access to research

Ohio Supreme Court says university does not have to hand over spinal cord injury training videos to animal rights group

Written byTed Agres
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The Ohio State Supreme Court last week rejected a suit by an animal rights group demanding videotapes and other materials from a Federally funded program that teaches scientists how to induce and study spinal cord injuries in laboratory rodents. The court ruled that the materials used in Ohio State University College of Medicine?s training program were research-related intellectual property exempt from public disclosure. ?We considered this to be a very, very serious and important case because it amounted to whether or not an outside entity could have access to unpublished data from a researcher?s project,? said OSU spokesman Earl Holland. ?If the court had allowed that, it could have been extrapolated into a whole host of other areas of research, with material not being safeguarded as intellectual property,? he told The Scientist. In April 2005, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), a national nonprofit group that opposes the use of live animals in research, asked the court to compel release of photographs, videos, and other materials from OSU?s training program, a three-week course sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. PCRM argued that the records had been publicly released because OSU had previously loaned some materials to scientists and researcher trainees, and shown other records at medical conferences. But the court agreed with OSU that these disclosures were research-related and had been tightly restricted.?We were extremely disappointed that the [Ohio] Supreme Court decided to allow OSU to keep the records secret,? PCRM associate general counsel Dan Kinburn told The Scientist. ?We were looking for pictures of rats and mice that were injured primarily to educate the public about the pain and suffering that these animals endure.?Under a contract from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, OSU since 2003 has been running an annual course to train researchers to induce and study microscopic spinal cord injuries in laboratory rodents. The animals are anesthetized and recover quickly, the university claims, with a 98% survival rate. NIH?s Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) last year investigated the training program after animal rights groups targeted it, and found no problems. The state supreme court ruling ?should ease scientists? concerns that their research might be compromised by disclosure of data in areas of controversial biomedical research,? Doug Kniss, OSU?s senior associate vice president for research, said in a statement.Ted Agres tagres@the-scientist.com Links within this article State ex rel. Physicians Commt. for Responsible Medicine v. Ohio State Univ. Bd. of Trustees, 108 Ohio St.3d 288, 2006-Ohio-903. http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/0/2006/2006-ohio-903.pdfG. Hellekant, ?How regulation hamstrings animal research,? The Scientist, February 21, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23126/PCRM http://www.pcrm.org/OSU training program http://medicine.osu.edu/sci/L. Netter, ?UK rules against animal rights group,? The Scientist, December 7, 2005. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/22853/?Ohio State University reply to concerns raised over its NIH-funded spinal cord injury training program,? OSU. http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/spinalreply.htmNIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/olaw.htm?Federal NIH office clears Ohio State research program, finds no problem with animal treatment in spinal project,? OSU. http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/olawok.htm?Ohio supreme court supports OSU in animal rights lawsuit,? OSU. http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/pcrmsuit.htm
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
Image of a woman with her hands across her stomach. She has a look of discomfort on her face. There is a blown up image of her stomach next to her and it has colorful butterflies and gut bacteria all swarming within the gut.
November 2025, Issue 1

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

These fluttering sensations are the brain’s reaction to certain emotions, which can be amplified or soothed by the gut’s own “bugs".

View this Issue
Olga Anczukow and Ryan Englander discuss how transcriptome splicing affects immune system function in lung cancer.

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Pacific Biosciences logo
Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Conceptual cartoon image of gene editing technology

Exploring the State of the Art in Gene Editing Techniques

Bio-Rad
Conceptual image of a doctor holding a brain puzzle, representing Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Simplifying Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Blood Testing

fujirebio logo

Products

Eppendorf Logo

Research on rewiring neural circuit in fruit flies wins 2025 Eppendorf & Science Prize

Evident Logo

EVIDENT's New FLUOVIEW FV5000 Redefines the Boundaries of Confocal and Multiphoton Imaging

Evident Logo

EVIDENT Launches Sixth Annual Image of the Year Contest

10x Genomics Logo

10x Genomics Launches the Next Generation of Chromium Flex to Empower Scientists to Massively Scale Single Cell Research