Skip to main content

Stem cell supporters upset by Bush veto

President's decision blocks congressional okay to expand funding; he also signs into law legislation banning 'fetal farming'

Written byTed Agres
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Supporters of expanded Federal funding for human embryonic stem cells (hESC) are voicing their disappointment over President Bush's decision yesterday (July 19) to veto a controversial bill (HR 810) that would have extended Federal research funding to newly derived hESCs. He also signed into law a less-contentious bill (S 3504) that prohibits trafficking human fetal tissue "gestated for research purposes." Both bills had passed the Senate one day earlier (July 18).The stem cell expansion bill "would support the taking of innocent human life in the hope of finding medical benefits for others," Bush said in a speech from the White House, surrounded by 18 children "adopted" as surplus embryos created by in vitro fertilization. "It crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect, so I vetoed it," Bush said.The House of Representatives, where the expansion bill originated, sought to over-ride the President's veto yesterday, but the vote of 235 to 193 fell 51 votes short of the two-thirds needed. While some House members yesterday discussed ways to re-introduce the bill in other forms, the Senate agreed last month not to consider any further stem cell legislation for the remainder of the session.While widely expected, Bush's veto -- the first of his presidency -- was met with disappointment and frustration by legislators and biomedical research advocates. "The entire advocacy community will be grappling with what to do now," said Carrie Wolinetz, senior public policy analyst at the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). "We haven't given up hope, but we are moving only on sheer optimism at this point," she told The Scientist. Bush's veto "sets us back a year or so until we can finally pass a bill that will have the requisite supermajority to be able to become law, and that sets back embryonic stem cell research another year or so," said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), one of many Republican senators who supports expanded research funding, at a Senate press gathering."It was deplorable that Bush vetoed the bill," said Bernard Siegel, executive director of the Genetics Policy Institute. "There is a broad consensus in the U.S. that this research needs to advance," he said, predicting that a groundswell of public support will turn what is now a political issue into a consumer one."A broad base in society is saying, we want this research and we want the potential that this research will bring," Siegel told The Scientist.It was not clear when the House might resume consideration of a non-controversial third stem cell bill (S 2754) that did not receive enough House votes to earn an expedited review. The measure, which directs the National Institutes of Health to support alternative ways of deriving hESC without destroying embryos, was unanimously approved by the Senate Tuesday. "This is an important piece of legislation," Bush said. "I'm disappointed that the House failed to authorize funding for this vital and ethical research."Ted Agres tagres@the-scientist.comLinks within this article"Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005" (HR 810) thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h.r.810:T Agres, "U.S. Senate approves stem cell bills," The Scientist, July 19, 2006 www.thescientist.com/news/display/23983/Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 2006 (S 3504) thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:s.3504:T Agres, "U.S. Senate to OK expanded stem cell bill?" The Scientist, July 10, 2006 www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23895/Genetics Policy Institute www.genpol.org/"Alternative Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies Enhancement Act" (S 2754) thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2754:
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi
Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mission bio

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo