Event organizers are taking criticism for choosing to exclude men from giving talks.

The government wants to limit a person’s sex to male or female as determined by genitalia at birth and genetics. It’s not so simple, say scientists.

Controversy surrounding a mathematical model to explain the so-called “greater variability of males” hypothesis fells two versions of a paper—but critics of the work wish it were still published.

The journal undertook a self-assessment, finding men have more success than women with all-male review panels.

Activists are protesting imbalanced conferences, editorial boards, and other professional activities by refusing to join.

Female PIs apply for fewer grants, but retain support once they get it.

An analysis of abstracts from American Geophysical Union meetings reveals that female scientists get fewer speaking opportunities than men.

Research into the biological basis of gender identity is in its infancy, but clues are beginning to emerge.

How can science inform the debate on gender?