Skip to main content

Study Finds Gender Imbalances in First-Time NIH Awards

Overall, men received more money on average, but R01s were an exception.

Written byShawna Williams
| 2 min read
a woman working in a lab

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

ABOVE: © ISTOCK.COM, JGALLONE

Women receiving their first research grant from the National Institutes of Health are awarded an average of $39,000 less than men, according to an analysis published this week (March 5) in JAMA.

The authors of the study did not find discrepancies in performance between the men and women in the study that might explain the difference—both groups had published similar numbers of papers, with similar citation figures, and differences in funding remained even when the analysis was limited to researchers at certain types of institutions, such as those in the Ivy League. However, the trend was reversed when the analysis homed in on certain highly funded grants, such as those known as R01s, for which first-time women awardees received nearly $16,000 more, on average, than their male counterparts.

“That first grant is monumentally important and determines your trajectory,” Carolina Abdala, a head and neck specialist at ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Shawna was an editor at The Scientist from 2017 through 2022. She holds a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from Colorado College and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Previously, she worked as a freelance editor and writer, and in the communications offices of several academic research institutions. As news director, Shawna assigned and edited news, opinion, and in-depth feature articles for the website on all aspects of the life sciences. She is based in central Washington State, and is a member of the Northwest Science Writers Association and the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

The Scientist October Digest cover
October 2026

Antarctica’s Blood Falls Teems With Mysterious Microbial Life

Miles away from the closest ocean, marine microbes thrive in the red ice and mud around Blood Falls, offering clues to microbial adaptation and past climate events.

View this Issue
Evaluating Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Staging

Evaluating Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Staging

​Beckman Coulter
Find better biologics faster with Stunner and the AI Developability Workcell

Find better biologics faster with Stunner and the AI Developability Workcell

Unchained Labs
An image of microcentrifuge tubes arranged within colorful laboratory racks.

Choose clarity. Choose speed. Choose MyMass™

Refeyn
Characterizing LNP Heterogeneity With Super-Resolution Imaging

Characterizing LNP Heterogeneity With Super-Resolution Imaging

Oni

Products

Stellaromics Logo

Stellaromics Expands Pyxa Adoption as Instruments are Installed at Leading Research Institutions Across the U.S. and EuropeStellaromics, Inc., the leader in 3D

A monoclonal antibody surrounded by immune cells and red blood cells

CellRaft AIR: Find the Right Antibody-Producing Cells Faster

Cell Microsystems
Maxwell® Rapid ccfDNA Kit

Maxwell® Rapid ccfDNA Kit: Automated Purification of ccfDNA in Under 30 Minutes

Promega
Leica Biosystems, Tempus, and Paige logos side by side, marking the addition of Paige digital pathology AI tools to the Aperio AI Store.

Oncology Researchers Gain AI Cancer Tools in One Platform