A response to Ada Hagan’s opinion piece suggesting that our study “compromises response to gender bias.”

A recent analysis that claimed no evidence of gender-based peer review outcomes fails to account for several factors.

Scientists from countries with fewer resources are pushing collaborators from higher-income countries to shed biases and behaviors that perpetuate social stratification in the research community.

Then there are the counterfeiters.

Meet some of the people featured in the December 2020 issue of The Scientist.

Responses collected from around 25,000 academics reveal that 20 percent couldn’t do their work at all in the spring, but most had found ways to keep their research going.

While some academics have called for compensation for assessing other scientists’ work, publishers haven’t warmed to the idea.

Predatory journals are especially dangerous during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The changes, which affect the declarations authors have to sign and the peer-review process, have received a mixed response from the scientific community.