For decades, researchers have complained that the publication and evaluation systems in academia are broken or need urgent reform. There have been calls for a more equitable system where scientists are evaluated based on the rigor, quality, significance, and impact of their work instead of their institutional affiliation and the impact factors of the journals where their research is published. On October 20, eLife, a peer-reviewed journal, announced new changes in their publishing policies that they claim will make this possible.
As of January 2023, eLife will no longer make acceptance or rejection decisions of papers that are submitted for publication. Instead, the journal will publish every paper that it sends out for review as a preprint, along with the peer reviewers’ comments and the journal’s editorial assessment of the work, which will highlight the significance of the research and the extent to which the evidence provided by the authors ...


















