Trialed Ebola Treatment Ineffective

Field tests fail to show improved prognosis for Ebola-infected patients treated with survivors’ blood plasma.

Written byCatherine Offord
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share

An Ebola treatment unit in neighboring LiberiaWIKIMEDIA, CDC The experimental treatment of people infected with Ebola using blood plasma from patients who survived Ebola infection has not significantly decreased mortality, according to a field evaluation published yesterday (January 7) in The New England Journal of Medicine. The trial was intended to test whether transfusions containing survivor-derived, Ebola-fighting antibodies might be effective at combatting the disease in other patients.

“Of course you would like to dream and see a very strong reduction in mortality, but we didn't see this,” coauthor Johan van Griensven of the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium, told Reuters.

The trial was carried out in Guinea, the site of the most recent outbreak, at a medical center in the nation’s capital, Conakry. Researchers compared death rates in a test group of 84 patients who received donated plasma with rates in a control group of 418 patients who received standard treatment.

They found slightly lower death rates in the plasma-treated group compared to the control group (31 percent and 38 percent, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant. The effect of treatment was even less striking once additional factors ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • After undergraduate research with spiders at the University of Oxford and graduate research with ants at Princeton University, Catherine left arthropods and academia to become a science journalist. She has worked in various guises at The Scientist since 2016. As Senior Editor, she wrote articles for the online and print publications, and edited the magazine’s Notebook, Careers, and Bio Business sections. She reports on subjects ranging from cellular and molecular biology to research misconduct and science policy. Find more of her work at her website.

    View Full Profile
Share
July Digest 2025
July 2025, Issue 1

What Causes an Earworm?

Memory-enhancing neural networks may also drive involuntary musical loops in the brain.

View this Issue
Genome Modeling and Design: From the Molecular to Genome Scale

Genome Modeling and Design: From the Molecular to Genome Scale

Twist Bio 
Screening 3D Brain Cell Cultures for Drug Discovery

Screening 3D Brain Cell Cultures for Drug Discovery

DNA and pills, conceptual illustration of the relationship between genetics and therapeutic development

Multiplexing PCR Technologies for Biopharmaceutical Research

Thermo Fisher Logo
Discover how to streamline tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte production.

Producing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapeutics

cytiva logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Sino Biological Sets New Industry Standard with ProPure Endotoxin-Free Proteins made in the USA

sartorius-logo

Introducing the iQue 5 HTS Platform: Empowering Scientists  with Unbeatable Speed and Flexibility for High Throughput Screening by Cytometry

parse_logo

Vanderbilt Selects Parse Biosciences GigaLab to Generate Atlas of Early Neutralizing Antibodies to Measles, Mumps, and Rubella

shiftbioscience

Shift Bioscience proposes improved ranking system for virtual cell models to accelerate gene target discovery