Skip to main content

Arguments Heard in CRISPR Patent Battle

The highly publicized legal fight over the intellectual property rights for CRISPR gene-editing technology comes to a head, as both sides present oral arguments.

Written byJef Akst
| 5 min read
Image of judge gavel and scale against a background of books, signifying the court hearing arguments in the CRISPR patent battle.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
5:00

The line started to form outside the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) before 8:30 this morning. By 9:30, there were far more people gathered than would be allowed in.

The crowd had gathered in Alexandria, Virginia to watch oral arguments in ongoing CRISPR-Cas9 patent dispute. The gene editing technology stands to change the way scientists tweak DNA with immense applications in CRISPR therapies, and thus could be worth billions of dollars. Two key parties stake claims to that market: the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and the University of California, Berkeley.

In May 2012, Jennifer Doudna of UC Berkeley and colleagues (including Emmanuelle Charpentier, formerly of the University of Vienna) filed a provisional patent application, describing her team’s ability to use the gene-editing pathway in vitro. “[Doudna’s team] does mention eukaryotic cells but is light on the details on how to scale that technology,” Jake Sherkow of New ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Jef (an unusual nickname for Jennifer) got her master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses. After four years of diving off the Gulf Coast of Tampa and performing behavioral experiments at the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga, she left research to pursue a career in science writing. As The Scientist's managing editor, Jef edited features and oversaw the production of the TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. In 2022, her feature on uterus transplantation earned first place in the trade category of the Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

cytiva logo
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Scientist holding a clear 384-well PCR microplate in a laboratory

What Dictates PCR Success Before Amplification Begins?

Integra Logo
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo