Skip to main content

Bird Diversity Drops From Forests to Farms

Farms support less phylogenetically diverse bird populations than forests, but some farms are better than others.

Written byRuth Williams
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Rufous-tailed JacamarDANIEL KARPBirds living in the rainforests of Costa Rica represent around 4.1 billion years of evolutionary history, while those that occupy nearby farmland can represent as little as 3.3 billion years, according to a paper published today (September 11) in Science. While the results suggest that agriculture diminishes phylogenetic diversity, researchers have also found that farms with mixed agriculture support far greater diversity than those with intensive monocultures.

“We’ve known for a while that intensive agricultural monocultures tend to have lower numbers of different species than diversified agricultural systems, which themselves tend to have lower numbers than undisturbed forests,” said Walter Jetz, a professor of global biodiversity, ecology, and conservation at Yale University who was not involved in the work. “What this study now adds is that, it is not just the count of different species but also the amount of evolutionary history, or phylogenetic diversity, that is different.” That is, farms tend to “harbor less of the avian tree of life,” he said.

Assessing the biodiversity of a given environment was traditionally accomplished by counting the number of species present, said Daniel Karp, a postdoctoral scientist in the department of Environmental Science, ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • ruth williams

    Ruth is a freelance journalist. Before freelancing, Ruth was a news editor for the Journal of Cell Biology in New York and an assistant editor for Nature Reviews Neuroscience in London. Prior to that, she was a bona fide pipette-wielding, test tube–shaking, lab coat–shirking research scientist. She has a PhD in genetics from King’s College London, and was a postdoc in stem cell biology at Imperial College London. Today she lives and writes in Connecticut.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

cytiva logo
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Scientist holding a clear 384-well PCR microplate in a laboratory

What Dictates PCR Success Before Amplification Begins?

Integra Logo
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo