Does the medical literature need more case studies? A new journal is betting it does, even as editors at other journals say the answer is no.Historically, case reports have proven extremely valuable to clinicians faced with diseases they knew little about. But in an age where countries spend more on research than ever before investigating both rare and common diseases, some experts argue that the obscure nature of many case reports makes them of little value to the average practitioner. Case reports typically receive fewer citations than research articles, putting them in danger of being phased out at journals where citation data rule decisions, said Matthew Cockerill of BioMedCentral (BMC, sister company to The Scientist), which publishes the new online open access journal, The Journal of Medical Case Reports. Indeed, a 2005 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed that case reports receive the fewest...
Journal of the American Medical AssociationThe ScientistBritish Medical JournalThe ScientistBMJMatthew FalagasarticleAmerican Journal of MedicineThe ScientistThe ScientistThe British Medical JournalBMJThe ScientistBMJThe LancetThe LancetThe ScientistNew England Journal of MedicineNEJMThe ScientistThe ScientistNew England Journal of Medicine [All Fields]The American Journal of MedicineeditorialThe American Journal of MedicineThe ScientistThe Journal of Medical Case Reportsheremail@the-scientist.comThe Scientist of Medical Case Reports J Med J Med

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!