Skip to main content

Continued Fallout from Macchiarini Misconduct

The sacked researcher and surgeon was not properly vetted by the Swedish institutions that hired him in 2010, according to an independent review panel. 

Written byBob Grant
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

PIXABAY, DEBORABALVESThe swath of destruction caused by the alleged misconduct and fraud of surgeon Paolo Macchiarini continues to widen, as an independent panel reviews his case. In a report released last week (August 31), investigators commissioned by the Karolinska University Hospital—where Macchiarini used to work—stated that both the hospital and the Karolinska Institute (KI) failed to heed warning signs that the artificial organ researcher’s skill and professionalism was not up to par with the reputation he had cultivated in the popular press.

“Macchiarini was recruited as a senior physician at the hospital even though there were strongly critical opinions from his previous employers,” the investigators wrote. “Group thinking, bandwagon effects, a very competitive care environment, many informal leaders and deficient knowledge of and respect for rules are some of the factors that may have contributed to the course of events.”

Two KI officials are suffering backlash from the Macchiarini case. Anders Hamsten, who had already resigned from the institute’s vice-chancellor position over his role in hiring Macchiarini, and Harriet Wallberg, who was president of KI when the surgeon was hired, were both dismissed from the panel that awards Nobel Prizes for Medicine, according to The Guardian. In addition, Wallberg was fired from her post as the chancellor ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi
Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mission bio

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo